The Vikram lander was supposed to release a briefcase-size rover from its belly.

ISRO

‘Failure is part of the game’: Indian spacecraft presumed lost after moon landing attempt

India’s attempt to land near the south pole of the moon, part of the Chandrayaan-2 mission, ended when mission managers lost contact with the lander—seconds before touchdown—just 2 kilometers from the moon’s surface. The lander, which would have made India the fourth nation to land on the moon after the United States, the former Soviet Union, and China, is presumed to be lost, although officials at the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) have not confirmed whether the spacecraft crashed.
 
When contact was lost, at 1:52 a.m. local time, the mood in the ISRO mission control center in Bengaluru was transformed. Cheerful smiles became sullen expressions on the faces of crestfallen scientists and engineers. A running mission commentary, part of a nationwide broadcast to millions, was suddenly stopped. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was observing from just outside of the control center, was briefed and left soon thereafter. A press conference, set for the next morning, was canceled.

“Failure is part of the game, and India was attempting something it had never attempted before, had no experience in,” says Ajey Lele, a senior fellow at India’s Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses, a government-funded think tank in New Delhi.

ISRO scientists believe a malfunction occurred during the “15 minutes of terror”: the duration of the lander’s descent from lunar orbit to the surface. In this critical phase, the lander was functioning autonomously, based on in-built intelligence, with no direct commands from ground stations. There are indications that the lander deviated from its preprogrammed trajectory and could not control its speed with its four side thrusters and one middle engine. ISRO says it is analyzing data to pinpoint what went wrong.

The 1477-kilogram lander was called Vikram, after Vikram Sarabhai, one of the founders of India’s space program. If it had landed successfully, a 26-kilogram rover the size of a briefcase, called Pragyaan, was to have rolled down a ramp from the belly of the lander. Plans called for the solar-powered rover to traverse a half-kilometer and collect data for 14 Earth-days or 1 lunar day.

ISRO officials were conscious of the low success rate of moon missions. ISRO Chairperson Kailasavadivoo Sivan never tired of explaining that this was an extraordinarily complex mission, the kind which ISRO had never attempted before—and at a difficult site, the south pole of the moon, where landing is not easy, and where nobody had gone before. 

In April, an Israeli robotic spacecraft called Beresheet crash-landed on the moon after communications were lost near the surface. However, on 3 January, China successfully launched and landed its ongoing robotic lander and rover mission Chang’e-4 at South Pole-Aitken Basin, a site on the far side of the moon farther from the south pole than Chandrayaan-2’s landing site.

Over the past few years, the Chandrayaan-2 mission suffered numerous hiccups and delays and was postponed more than a half-dozen times. A major delay came in 2013, when Russia, which was supposed to supply the lander and the rover, backed out of the joint mission, forcing India to develop these technologies from scratch.

On 15 July, barely 1 hour before a scheduled launch, the mission was aborted. The reason, ISRO soon discovered, was a leak in a pressure-supplying system. ISRO plugged the leak just in time to launch the mission on 22 July.

Some experts believe India needs to improve its space technology. Fifty years ago, it took NASA’s Apollo missions just 3 days to reach the moon because of the power of its rockets. It took Chandrayaan-2 48 days to reach the moon using its Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle Mark III rocket, in its first operational flight. Lele says the low capacity of the rockets is a problem because it limits mission payloads. “That’s where India is lacking and needs to augment its capabilities,” Lele says.

G. Madhavan Nair, a former ISRO chair who was a key steward of the Chandrayaan-1 mission, says even with a failure of the lander, the mission can still do science with its Chandrayaan-2 orbiter. The orbiter, which released Vikram, has eight instruments that will map the moon for at least 1 year—and possibly identify the fate of the lander near its intended landing site. “I will say 90% of the mission is successful,” he says.

Hours after the landing broadcast ended, Modi returned to the mission control center to offer support to ISRO scientists and hugged Sivan. “We came close but need to cover more ground. The effort was worth it and so was the journey,” Modi told ISRO scientists.

Tychocrater Chandrayaan-2 landing site nearsouthern pole Lander Seeking ground truth Rover S Sea ofSerenity Copernicuscrater Moon Equator Bulk of previouslunar landings Solarpanel Warmelectronicsbox With spectrometers for assaying elements in the regolith, the briefcase-size rover hopes to make the most of the 14-Earth-day lunar day. Exploring lunar nova The lander is equipped with a seismometer to listen for moonquakes and a Langmuir probe that will measure fluctuations in the wispy plasma enveloping the lunar surface. Pole position India’s Chandrayaan-2 mission is scheduled to land near the south pole of the moon on 7 September. It would be the first landing so far from the equator. Navigationcamera Ramp Rover Landing skid N
C. BICKEL/SCIENCE