Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


E-Letter responses to:

reports:
Xiaokun Shu, Antoine Royant, Michael Z. Lin, Todd A. Aguilera, Varda Lev-Ram, Paul A. Steinbach, and Roger Y. Tsien
Mammalian Expression of Infrared Fluorescent Proteins Engineered from a Bacterial Phytochrome
Science 2009; 324: 804-807 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*E-Letters: Submit a response to this article

Published E-Letter responses:

[Read E-Letter] Mouse Liver Fluorescence Is Shown with GFP
Sheldon Penman, Robert M. Hoffman   (17 August 2009)

Mouse Liver Fluorescence Is Shown with GFP 17 August 2009
  Top
Sheldon Penman,
Professor of Surgery Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA,
Robert M. Hoffman

Respond to this E-Letter:
Re: Mouse Liver Fluorescence Is Shown with GFP

Roger Tsien's laboratory recently reported the development of a long wavelength protein chromophore, with potential advantages for non-invasive imaging of internal organs by fluorescence in living animals ("Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome," by X. Shu et al., Reports, 8 May 2009, p. 804). However, this otherwise impressive report erroneously claims that employing green fluorescent protein (GFP) yields no detectable external fluorescence from the liver, thereby ignoring an extensive and well-documented literature describing non-invasive imaging of internal GFP fluorescence in living animals (Figure 3). The claim is much more than merely an incorrect datum. External imaging of internal fluorescence is a relatively new technique and is supported by several hundred published peer-reviewed papers, including approximately 70 from the Hoffman group (for instance, 1, 2). For those entering the field, the stability and high quantum efficiency of GFP requires only inexpensive equipment for such experiments. Unfortunately, there are a surprising number of unsubstantiated claims of GFP failure. In this case, an apparently similar claim by a prestigious scientist in a leading scientific journal may unnecessarily retard progress in this field.

In contrast to the Shu et al. Report, panels C and D in Figure 1 of M. Yang et al. present non-invasive images of interior GFP fluorescence (3). Other images appear in numerous peer-reviewed publications, such as M. T. Henman et al. in Nature (4). Shu et al.'s data in the panel A of Figure 3 fail to show GFP fluorescence from a labeled mouse liver. This apparent contradiction is most probably due to the presence of intense keratin autofluorescence in the remnant hairs bordering the shaved area. This strong autofluorescence very likely punches through the filter channel, saturating the imaging instrument. Successful experiments imaging GFP use either nude mice or wild-type mice which are shaved to remove the hair.

Sheldon Penman

Professor of Surgery Emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Robert M. Hoffman

AntiCancer, Inc., 7917 Ostrow Street, San Diego, CA 92111, USA.

References

1. R. M. Hoffman, Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 796 (2005).

2. R. M. Hoffman, M. Yang, Nat. Protoc. 1, 1429 (2006).

3. M. Yang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 12278 (2000).

4. M. T. Henman et al., Nature 436, 807 (2005).


To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)