Dear Editors and Publishers,
I just read Eugene Robison's Washington Post editorial, "Storms
Concentrate the Mind" (9/23/05), in which he refers to the research in this
article. My interest kindled, I directed myself to the web version of your
magazine fully expecting to be turned away by membership or other
restrictions. I was pleasantly surprised, and encouraged, to find
available to me your free selection of articles on hurricane- related
topics, and read them with great interest.
Following my reading, the immediate response that came to mind was,
bless you for your public service. By making available to the public
sound science that demonstrates the relationship between increases in
ocean surface temperature and the most severe hurricanes, you greatly
contribute to both the education of the lay reader, and the public policy
debate.
And although I'm not likely to start my Monday morning water cooler
conversation with, "Say, did you see that Science Magazine article about
increases in cyclonic storm intensity," I might. The point is, that with
so much of the public, and many policy makers, either ignorant about or
hostel to basic science -- from misguided educators toying with inclusion
of intelligent design into school curricula, to self-serving politicians
failing to make prudent policy decisions in the face of potentially
disastrous consequences resulting from global warming -- it is valuable and
important that easily accessible primary scientific sources be made
available to the lay citizenry.
Your decision to provide an open source of information and
communication not only raises the level of scientific literacy and policy
debate –- it provides us each (tired as we are of hearing about
catastrophic storm damage and a foreign war) with a refreshingly pristine
source of knowledge in a world where we are otherwise overwhelmed by spin,
bias, and outright deceit.