This is similar to what all of us restorationist types are collectively
doing in the Midwest; we just haven't begun to speak of our individual
ecological restoration projects as part of a larger, greater whole. Even
though many of us likely think on this order of magnitude, it would
greatly improve our results if we would talk like this.
Ours is fundamentally the same story, although humans directly
impacting the macro fauna is only part of the story here [i.e., humans stop
wildfire, allowing woods to invade, which negatively impacts natural
communities; humans reek large-scale physical destruction to natural
communities (e.g., agriculture); humans rapidly introduce non-native
species; etc].
I believe that we restorationists/preservationists, by speaking of
our endeavors as part of a global restoration/stabilization project, could
potentially attract attention and new resources and partners to our cause.
If each individual landowner/restorationist, along with all agency
restorationists (Department of the Interior, Department of Agriculture, state DNR's, etc.), all
NGO restorationists (TNC, TPE, IPN, TU, IPAW, etc.), and all commercial
restorationists spoke of our projects as being part of a greater societal
thrust, we may be able to improve our odds of making a difference.
Jesse Bennett
Driftless Land Stewardship LLC
13058 Rock School Rd.
Glen Haven, WI 53810
www.driftlesslandstewardship.com