Merikangas and Risch (1) argue that complex diseases should be
prioritized for genetic research based on several criteria including
whether or not there is a “limited ability to modify exposure or risk
factors.” Based on their criterion, genetic studies of type 2 diabetes,
which they suggest
appears “to be highly amenable to environmental modification," i.e.
prevention of obesity and physical inactivity, would have lower priority
for funding.
Although there have been positive reports that intensive diet and
exercise interventions reduce the incidence of type2 diabetes (2), these
studies have not demonstrated that lifestyle interventions have lifetime
effects, or that they prevent diabetes in all subjects, or that these
treatments are effective for the most obese patients. Despite the
annual expenditure of more than $33 billion (1995 dollars) per year on
weight reduction products and services (3), most patients who complete
weight loss programs lose only about 10% of their body weight, regain
two-thirds back within one year, and most of it back within five years
(3). Indeed, the obesity epidemic has grown in magnitude such that now
more than half of the U.S. population is overweight or obese. The lack
of efficacy of currently available therapies for obesity has driven many
seriously obese individuals to choose gastric bypass surgery. An
estimated 120,000 Americans this year will opt for this radical treatment,
and many more will make the same choice unless fundamentally
different approaches are developed for obesity treatment.
It is clear that genetics influences many aspects of obesity, from
response to diet and exercise, to maternal effects and major gene
effects. Finding the underlying genes offers at least the possibility
that
novel therapeutic targets may be discovered for the prevention of
obesity and its sequellae: type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and
cancer.
1. K. R. Merikangas, N. Risch, Science 302, 599 (2003).
2. W. C. Knowler et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 393 (2002).
3. Committee to Develop Criteria for Evaluation the Outcomes of
Approaches to Prevent and Treat Obesity. P. R. Thomas, Ed., Food and
Nutrition Board (Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press,
Washington, D.C., 1995).