Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Science Careers Booklet

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 12 October 2001:
Vol. 294. no. 5541, pp. 309 - 310
DOI: 10.1126/science.1065349
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Policy Forum

OCEANS:
Dis-Crediting Ocean Fertilization

Sallie W. Chisholm,* Paul G. Falkowski, John J. Cullen

Episodic phytoplankton blooms are part of the natural cycle of production and regeneration in ocean ecosystems. There is growing interest in using iron fertilization to produce massive phytoplankton blooms in parts of the ocean where they do not now occur. The goal is to transfer carbon from the atmosphere to the deep sea (see also the Perspective by Seibel and Walsh in this issue of Science) and trade it in the emerging carbon credit market. In their Policy Forum, Chisholm, Falkowski, and Cullen warn that iron fertilization would be extremely difficult to validate and would significantly alter oceanic food webs and biogeochemical cycles.

S. W. Chisholm is in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. P. Falkowski is in the Department of Geology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. J. J. Cullen is in the Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chisholm{at}mit.edu

Read the Full Text

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)