Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 July 2008:
Vol. 321. no. 5885, p. 15
DOI: 10.1126/science.1162115
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Editorial

Reviewing Peer Review

Bruce Alberts1, Brooks Hanson2, Katrina L. Kelner3

Peer review, in which experts in the field scrutinize and critique scientific results prior to publication, is fundamental to scientific progress, and the achievements of science in the last century are an endorsement of its value. Peer review influences more than just science. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other similar advisory groups base their judgments on peer-reviewed literature, and this is part of their success. Many legal decisions and regulations also depend on peer-reviewed science. Thus, thorough, expert review of research results--without compensation--is an obligation that scientists shoulder for both science and the general public.

1Bruce Alberts is the Editor-in-Chief of Science.

2Brooks Hanson is Deputy Editor for physical sciences at Science.

3Katrina L. Kelner is Deputy Editor for life sciences at Science.

Read the Full Text


E-Letters:

Read all E-Letters

Quality Control for Peer Reviewers
Robert E. Cone
Science Online, 3 Oct 2008 [Full text]

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)