Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 14 March 2008:
Vol. 319. no. 5869, p. 1457
DOI: 10.1126/science.1155724

Editorial

The IPCC Must Maintain Its Rigor

Susan Solomon1 Martin Manning2

Last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize along with Albert Gore Jr., sending a strong message about the importance of the world's future climate. Indeed, for two decades, international scientists and policy-makers contributing to the IPCC process have provided assessments of climate change science, impacts, and mitigation, addressing one of the most far-reaching and complex challenges that society has ever faced. Yet this is no time for the IPCC to rest on its laurels. The climate system continues to change and science continues to improve, so policy must be kept current with our best understanding. Reformulating the science/policy interface should be considered and be open to change but must acknowledge lessons from the past. The factors that have been critical to the success of the IPCC need to be preserved if a rigorous scientific basis is to continue to inform the growing challenge of decision-making on climate change.


Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)