Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 16 November 2007:
Vol. 318. no. 5853, p. 1037
DOI: 10.1126/science.1151606

Editorial

Robot Ethics

Robert J. Sawyer

C-3PO and R2-D2 may be two of the world's most famous fictional robots, but a quasi-robot named MQ-5B/C is perhaps more interesting just now. On 1 September 2007, operators used this unmanned airborne drone to locate and drop a bomb on two individuals who appeared to be planting explosives near Qayyarah, Iraq. As we make robots more intelligent and autonomous, and eventually endow them with the independent capability to kill people, surely we need to consider how to govern their behavior and how much freedom to accord them--so-called roboethics. Science fiction dealt with this prospect decades ago; governments are wrestling with it today. Why now? It's not only because robots are killing people. It's also because they have become household consumer-electronics items and because some now look and act like humans (Honda's Asimo can even dance). We have an instinctive reaction that a threshold has been crossed.


Robert J. Sawyer is a Hugo and Nebula Award-winning science-fiction writer. E-mail: sawyer{at}sfwriter.com

Read the Full Text






To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)