Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Focus on Europe

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 2 November 2007:
Vol. 318. no. 5851, p. 715
DOI: 10.1126/science.1151603

Editorial

Approaching Science

Donald Kennedy

Science communication is a hot topic these days. I know of two committees exploring how science journalists and scientists can find new ways of working more effectively with one another. Programs such as the Aldo Leopold Leadership fellowships are educating young scientists about how to make their work more understandable to the public and to the mainstream media. These are common-sense responses to two important changes. First, the scientific disciplines are drilling deeper into the fine details of everything from atmospheric physics to the molecular basis of cell signaling. Acronyms and other shorthand indicia are used more often than ever, and even the titles of research papers are sometimes challenging. Second, science and technology are increasingly relevant to public policy, and unless those who speak for science can be understood, the policy decisions are likely to be wrong.


Donald Kennedy is the Editor-in-Chief of Science.

Read the Full Text






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)