Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Phire Hot Start DNA Polymerase

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 21 September 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5845, p. 1649
DOI: 10.1126/science.1148839

Editorial

A Critical Vote Down Under

Ian Lowe

An election will be held in Australia later this year. The conservative government of John Howard has been in power for 11 years--bad years for basic science. Although medical research has done well, overall public funding of science has declined from 0.77 to 0.59% of gross domestic product, placing Australia among the bottom countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in science investment. Public policies have also caused a decline in commercial research and innovation. Whereas previous governments had encouraged private-sector R&D with a 150% tax concession, the first Howard budget cut that program, doubling the cost of research for profitable private companies. Commercial research spending fell dramatically and has only just returned to the 1996 level.


Ian Lowe is an emeritus professor at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. He was previously the head of the university's School of Science.

Read the Full Text





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)