Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 6 July 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5834, p. 17
DOI: 10.1126/science.1147131

Editorial

Science Teaching Roundup

Donald Kennedy

Higher education, not only in the United States but in many other nations as well, has come in for recent criticism about the way it prepares undergraduate students for Life Afterward. For our readers, there's a two-way concern about science education. First, we are losing too many from the cohort of exceptionally able people who might go on to do graduate work and forge distinguished research careers. The second concern is about how well we instill in the others enough curiosity and basic understanding to qualify them as useful citizens of the modern world.


Donald Kennedy is Editor-in-Chief of Science.

Read the Full Text



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science.
S. G. Hoskins and L. M. Stevens (2009)
Advan Physiol Educ 33, 17-20
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

E-Letters:

Read all E-Letters

Ask An Undergrad
Peter D. Neff
Science Online, 4 Sep 2007 [Full text]



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)