Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 6 January 2006:
Vol. 311. no. 5757, p. 41
DOI: 10.1126/science.1122796
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Policy Forum

RESEARCH FUNDING:
Peer Review at NIH

Toni Scarpa

Effective grant review requires both continuity and change.

The author is director, NIH's Center for Scientific Review, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; e-mail scarpat{at}csr.nih.gov

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Predicting citation count of Bioinformatics papers within four years of publication.
A. Ibanez, P. Larranaga, and C. Bielza (2009)
Bioinformatics 25, 3303-3309
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and NIH Grant Process: An Overview.
A. B. Wolbarst and W. R. Hendee (2007)
Radiology 242, 32-55
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Transdisciplinary-Translation Revolution: Final Thoughts.
S. Sussman (2006)
Eval Health Prof 29, 348-352
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)