Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 1 July 2005:
Vol. 309. no. 5731, p. 102
DOI: 10.1126/science.309.5731.102
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News

Will Malthus Continue to Be Wrong?

Erik Stokstad

The urgent question is whether current standards of living can be sustained while improving the plight of those in need. How can humans live sustainably on the planet and do so in a way that manages to preserve some biodiversity?

Read the Full Text


E-Letters:

Read all E-Letters

Humans ARE the resources
Andy J. Canfield
Science Online, 6 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Check out "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn
Uwe Schuerkamp
Science Online, 6 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Malthus: Not the Solution to Poverty and Disease
Theodore C. Okeahialam, et al.
Science Online, 6 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Was Malthus "Wrong," or Simply Prophetic?
Seamus Decker
Science Online, 6 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Malthus was right
Jeffrey P. Townsend
Science Online, 12 Jul 2005 [Full text]
You asked the wrong question
David S Tseng
Science Online, 22 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Confounding Malthus
Alan R Thatcher
Science Online, 22 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Priorities
Thomas C. Ripley
Science Online, 22 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Humans Are the Resources
Natasha C.
Science Online, 18 Aug 2006 [Full text]

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)