Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Jo Handelsman,1* Diane Ebert-May,2 Robert Beichner,3 Peter Bruns,4 Amy Chang,5 Robert DeHaan,6,Ý Jim Gentile,7 Sarah Lauffer,1 James Stewart,8 Shirley M. Tilghman,9 William B. Wood10
For more than a decade, reports from expert panels have called for improvements in science education. There is general agreement that science courses consisting of traditional lectures and cookbook laboratory exercises need to be changed. What is required instead is "scientific teaching," teaching that mirrors science at its best-experimental, rigorous, and based on evidence. This Policy Forum explores the reasons for the slow pace of change in the way science is taught at research universities and offers recommendations for faculty, staff, and administrators at research universities, funding agencies, and professional organizations in order to accelerate the reform of science education. To help faculty initiate change in their own classrooms, this forum includes extensive resources to guide the transition to tested, effective instructional methods, which include group-learning in lectures, inquiry-based laboratories, and interactive computer modules.
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University; 3Department of Physics, North Carolina State University; 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute; 5American Society for Microbiology; 6National Research Council; 7Dean of Natural Sciences, Hope College; 8Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin-Madison; 9President, Princeton University; 10Department of Molecular Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder. For complete addresses, see SOM.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joh{at}plantpath.wisc.edu. Present address: Division of Educational Studies, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
LETTERS
J. Jose Bonner (8 October 2004) Science306 (5694), 228.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.306.5694.228] |Full Text »|PDF »
LETTERS
James Luken;, Jo Handelsman, Robert Beichner, Peter Bruns, Amy Chang, Robert DeHaan, Diane Ebert-May, Jim Gentile, Sarah Lauffer, James Stewart, and William B. Wood (8 October 2004) Science306 (5694), 229.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.306.5694.229] |Full Text »|PDF »
LETTERS
A. O. Dennis Willows (2 July 2004) Science305 (5680), 43a.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.305.5680.43a] |Full Text »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Teaching Creativity and Inventive Problem Solving in Science.
Summer Institute to Improve University Science Teaching.
C. Pfund, S. Miller, K. Brenner, P. Bruns, A. Chang, D. Ebert-May, A. P. Fagen, J. Gentile, S. Gossens, I. M. Khan, et al. (2009)
Science
324, 470-471
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
We've Got NERVE: A Call to Arms for Neuroscience Education.
K. J. Frantz, C. D. McNerney, and N. C. Spitzer (2009)
J. Neurosci.
29, 3337-3339
|Full Text »|PDF »
Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science.
A Combination of Hand-held Models and Computer Imaging Programs Helps Students Answer Oral Questions about Molecular Structure and Function: A Controlled Investigation of Student Learning.
M. A. Harris, R. F. Peck, S. Colton, J. Morris, E. Chaibub Neto, and J. Kallio (2009)
CBE Life Sci Educ
8, 29-43
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Can an Inquiry Approach Improve College Student Learning in a Teaching Laboratory?.
"Do I Need to Know This for the Exam?" Using Popular Media, Inquiry-based Laboratories, and a Community of Scientific Practice to Motivate Students to Learn Developmental Biology.
Alternation of Generations and Experimental Design: A Guided-Inquiry Lab Exploring the Nature of the her1 Developmental Mutant of Ceratopteris richardii (C-Fern).
Increased Learning Observed in Redesigned Introductory Biology Course that Employed Web-enhanced, Interactive Pedagogy.
C. N. McDaniel, B. C. Lister, M. H. Hanna, and H. Roy (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 243-249
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Selective Use of the Primary Literature Transforms the Classroom Into a Virtual Laboratory.
S. G. Hoskins, L. M. Stevens, and R. H. Nehm (2007)
Genetics
176, 1381-1389
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
WormClassroom.org: An Inquiry-rich Educational Web Portal for Research Resources of Caenorhabditis elegans.
F.-M. Lu, K. W. Eliceiri, J. Stewart, and J. G. White (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 98-108
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: Meeting the Goals of BIO2010.
A. M. Campbell, M. L. S. Ledbetter, L. L.M. Hoopes, T. T. Eckdahl, L. J. Heyer, A. Rosenwald, E. Fowlks, S. Tonidandel, B. Bucholtz, and G. Gottfried (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 109-118
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Prescribed Active Learning Increases Performance in Introductory Biology.
S. Freeman, E. O'Connor, J. W. Parks, M. Cunningham, D. Hurley, D. Haak, C. Dirks, and M. P. Wenderoth (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 132-139
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
A Faculty Team Works to Create Content Linkages among Various Courses to Increase Meaningful Learning of Targeted Concepts of Microbiology.
G. Marbach-Ad, V. Briken, K. Frauwirth, L.-Y. Gao, S. W. Hutcheson, S. W. Joseph, D. Mosser, B. Parent, P. Shields, W. Song, et al. (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 155-162
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Cooperative Learning in Industrial-sized Biology Classes.
N. Armstrong, S.-M. Chang, and M. Brickman (2007)
CBE Life Sci Educ
6, 163-171
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Enhancing Diversity in Science: Is Teaching Science Process Skills the Answer?.