Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Carbon capture and storage (or sequestration) is receiving increasing attention as one tool for reducing carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. In his Perspective, Lackner discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of carbon sequestration. He advises against sequestration in environmentally active carbon pools such as the oceans, because it may merely trade one environmental problem for another. Better sequestration options include underground injection and (possibly underground) neutralization. Taking into account carbon capture, transport, and storage, the author concludes that in the short and medium term, sequestration would almost certainly be cheaper than a full transition to nuclear, wind, or solar energy.
The author is in the Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. E-mail: kl2010{at}columbia.edu
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
LETTERS
Dan S. Golomb;, Meyer Steinberg;, and Klaus S. Lackner (5 September 2003) Science301 (5638), 1326.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.301.5638.1326] |Full Text »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Carbon Dioxide Fixation within Mine Wastes of Ultramafic-Hosted Ore Deposits: Examples from the Clinton Creek and Cassiar Chrysotile Deposits, Canada.
S. A. Wilson, G. M. Dipple, I. M. Power, J. M. Thom, R. G. Anderson, M. Raudsepp, J. E. Gabites, and G. Southam (2009)
Economic Geology
104, 95-112
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Carbon Dioxide Sequestration A Solution to a Global Problem.