Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Invitrogen

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 23 February 2001:
Vol. 291. no. 5508, p. 1443
DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5508.1443o

This Week in Science

In a study of the North American plant genus Lycium, Miller and Venable (Reports, 29 Sep. 2000, p. 2335) proposed that polyploidy may trigger gender dimorphism "by disrupting self-incompatibility and leading to inbreeding depression." Brunet and Liston argue that the analysis by Miller and Venable "does not support the claimed associations," suggest possible shortfalls in their method for measuring self-compatibility, and hold that showing the importance of the claimed associations in the evolution of gender dimorphism requires a demonstration "that gender dimorphism arises more frequently via this pathway than via other pathways." Miller and Venable cite additional phylogenetic work supporting their analysis and suggest some additional statistical tests for the notion of polyploidy as a trigger for gender dimorphism.The full text of these comments can be seen at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5508/1441a





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)