Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Ulrich Hoffrage,* Samuel Lindsey, Ralph Hertwig, Gerd Gigerenzer
Most people, experts included, have difficulties understanding and combining statistical information effectively. Hoffrage et al. demonstrate that these difficulties can be considerably reduced by communicating the information in terms of natural frequencies rather than in terms of probabilities. Several applications in medicine, legal decision-making, and education are discussed.
U. Hoffrage, R. Hertwig, and G. Gigerenzer are at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany. S. Lindsey is at the Department of Psychology, 102 Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hoffrage{at}mpib-berlin.mpg.de
This Policy Forum was collaboratively written to combine work submitted to Science independently by the first and second authors.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
LETTERS
Brian Butterworth;, Ulrich Hoffrage, Samuel Lindsey, Ralph Hertwig, and Gerd Gigerenzer (4 May 2001) Science292 (5518), 853c.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.292.5518.853c] |Full Text »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Effect of Risk Communication Formats on Risk Perception Depending on Numeracy.
C. Keller and M. Siegrist (2009)
Med Decis Making
29, 483-490
|Abstract »|PDF »
Natural Frequencies Help Older Adults and People with Low Numeracy to Evaluate Medical Screening Tests.
M. Galesic, G. Gigerenzer, and N. Straubinger (2009)
Med Decis Making
29, 368-371
|Abstract »|PDF »
The Effect of Graphical and Numerical Presentation of Hypothetical Prenatal Diagnosis Results on Risk Perception.
M. Siegrist, P. Orlow, and C. Keller (2008)
Med Decis Making
28, 567-574
|Abstract »|PDF »
Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial.
C. Abderhalden, I. Needham, T. Dassen, R. Halfens, H.-J. Haug, and J. E. Fischer (2008)
The British Journal of Psychiatry
193, 44-50
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review.
Communicating the Uncertainty of Harms and Benefits of Medical Interventions.
M. C. Politi, P. K. J. Han, and N. F. Col (2007)
Med Decis Making
27, 681-695
|Abstract »|PDF »
Risk Communication During Screening for Genomic Breast Cancer Susceptibility.
R. E. Gramling and J. I. Vidrine (2007)
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
1, 54-58
|Abstract »|PDF »
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review.
J. S Ancker, Y. Senathirajah, R. Kukafka, and J. B Starren (2006)
JAMIA
13, 608-618
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
To Bayes or Not to Bayes? A Comparison of Two Classes of Models of Information Aggregation.
D. V. Budescu and H.-T. Yu (2006)
Decision Analysis
3, 145-162
|Abstract »|PDF »
Patients' Perceptions of Cholesterol, Cardiovascular Disease Risk, and Risk Communication Strategies.
R. E. Goldman, D. R. Parker, C. B. Eaton, J. M. Borkan, R. Gramling, R. T. Cover, and D. K. Ahern (2006)
Ann. Fam. Med
4, 205-212
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Intuitions About Combining Opinions: Misappreciation of the Averaging Principle.
R. P. Larrick and J. B. Soll (2006)
Management Science
52, 111-127
|Abstract »|PDF »
A Randomized Trial of Ways To Describe Test Accuracy: The Effect on Physicians' Post-Test Probability Estimates.
M. A. Puhan, J. Steurer, L. M. Bachmann, and G. t. Riet (2005)
Ann Intern Med
143, 184-189
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Screening for Breast Cancer.
J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher (2005)
JAMA
293, 1245-1256
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Print Media Coverage of Antibiotic Resistance.
M. Desilva, M. A. T. Muskavitch, and J. P. Roche (2004)
Science Communication
26, 31-43
|Abstract »|PDF »
Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors?.
W. H. Verstappen, G. ter Riet, W. I Dubois, R. Winkens, R. P. Grol, and T. van der Weijden (2004)
Fam. Pract.
21, 387-395
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Understanding Statistical Information: The Problem of Numerical Interpretation.
K. Ghosh and A. K. Ghosh (2003)
Arch Intern Med
163, 2248
|Full Text »|PDF »
Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.
G. Gigerenzer and A. Edwards (2003)
BMJ
327, 741-744
|Full Text »|PDF »
Communication of risks: an analysis beyond numbers.
Effect of a Practice-Based Strategy on Test Ordering Performance of Primary Care Physicians: A Randomized Trial.
W. H. J. M. Verstappen, T. van der Weijden, J. Sijbrandij, I. Smeele, J. Hermsen, J. Grimshaw, and R. P. T. M. Grol (2003)
JAMA
289, 2407-2412
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic Testing.