Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 14 March 1997:
Vol. 275. no. 5306, pp. 1579 - 0
DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1579

News

Gilbert J. Chin, Jean Marx

Three hundred years ago, the French philosopher René Descartes gained immortality with his pronouncement, "I think, therefore I am." Today, a disparate band of researchers--physicians, psychologists, and neurobiologists--is asking the next question: How do we think? This special issue of Science surveys how they are trying to provide an answer by fusing the perspectives of their formerly separate disciplines.

In her Article, N. C. Andreasen discusses approaches to understanding schizophrenia as a dysfunction of specific cognitive systems, such as those for working memory and consciousness. The normal underpinnings of working memory and consciousness are also coming to light, as two stories in the Special News Section make clear. (For interactive demonstrations of behavioral paradigms used to study working memory, reconstructive memory, and visual-spatial attention, see J. D. Cohen's Web site at http://psyscope.psy.cmu.edu/cogdemos/welcome.html) In another Article, W. Schultz and his colleagues examine the neural basis of animals' ability to predict future events, an essential survival skill for finding food and mates and avoiding danger. They report that neurophysiological studies of primates, buttressed by computer modeling of neuronal behavior, have revealed the importance of a particular set of dopamine-releasing neurons.

The final pair of Articles describes two efforts to tackle that peculiarly human attribute--language. M. S. Seidenberg reviews the classic paradigm of Noam Chomsky that focuses on innate capabilities for language acquisition and processing, then suggests an alternative based on connectionist theories that attempt to explain learning as alterations in neuronal networks. And A. Prince and P. Smolensky review how optimization, a formal organizing principle derived from neural computation, can characterize grammar as a hierarchy of linguistic constraints. The satisfaction of a single set of constraints appears to resolve well-known inconsistencies between listening and speaking abilities when learning language.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Frontal Systems Dysfunction in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Learning Disabilities.
J. W. Lazar and Y. Frank (1998)
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 10, 160-167
   Abstract »    Full Text »
GIGANTEA is a nuclear protein involved in phytochrome signaling in Arabidopsis.
E. Huq, J. M. Tepperman, and P. H. Quail (2000)
PNAS 97, 9789-9794
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)