Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 2 February 1996:
Vol. 271. no. 5249, p. 586
DOI: 10.1126/science.271.5249.586

News & Comment

Eliot Marshall

Blood from the umbilical cord seems to offer a promising--and perhaps safer--alternative to bone marrow for transplants to treat a variety of life-threatening diseases. But the growth of cord blood banking raises some tough practical and ethical questions: Should donors' families give consent for genetic tests on the cells? Should the donor be told the results of these tests, and how can his or her privacy be protected? How can quality standards be enforced for centers assembling banks of cord blood?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Umbilical Cord Blood for Transplantation-Reply.
J. Sugarman, E. G. Reisner, and J. Kurtzberg (1996)
JAMA 275, 910
   Abstract »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)