Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 24 April 2009:
Vol. 324. no. 5926, pp. 519 - 522
DOI: 10.1126/science.1165598

Reports

Intuition and Deliberation: Two Systems for Strategizing in the Brain

Wen-Jui Kuo,1,* Tomas Sjöström,2,* Yu-Ping Chen,3 Yen-Hsiang Wang,4 Chen-Ying Huang3,{dagger}

Dual-process theories distinguish between intuition (fast and emotional) and reasoning (slow and controlled) as a basis for human decision-making. We contrast dominance-solvable games, which can be solved by step-by-step deliberative reasoning, with pure coordination games, which must be solved intuitively. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that the middle frontal gyrus, the inferior parietal lobule, and the precuneus were more active in dominance-solvable games than in coordination games. The insula and anterior cingulate cortex showed the opposite pattern. Moreover, precuneus activity correlates positively with how "effortful" a dominance-solvable game is, whereas insula activity correlates positively with how "effortless" a coordination game is.

1 Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
2 Department of Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
3 Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
4 Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.

{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chenying{at}ntu.edu.tw

Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)