Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 13 July 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5835, p. 183
DOI: 10.1126/science.317.5835.183c

ScienceScope

A report released last week by the U.S. climate science program paints a murky but grim picture of the effort needed to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Three independently developed models of how that might be done came up with costs that varied by a factor of 8 and ranged to "substantial" levels, even with some optimistic assumptions. "Technically," stabilizing atmospheric greenhouse gases "is not impossible," concluded report author James Edmonds of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Similar work summarized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change suggested that tackling the problem "is affordable," says economist William Pizer, of Washington, D.C.-based Resources for the Future, who said this report's "central tendencies" were "closer to the truth."






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)