Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 27 April 2007:
Vol. 316. no. 5824, pp. 567 - 570
DOI: 10.1126/science.1137959

Research Articles

Revisiting Carbon Flux Through the Ocean's Twilight Zone

Ken O. Buesseler,1* Carl H. Lamborg,1 Philip W. Boyd,2 Phoebe J. Lam,1 Thomas W. Trull,3 Robert R. Bidigare,4 James K. B. Bishop,5,6 Karen L. Casciotti,1 Frank Dehairs,7 Marc Elskens,7 Makio Honda,8 David M. Karl,4 David A. Siegel,9 Mary W. Silver,10 Deborah K. Steinberg,11 Jim Valdes,12 Benjamin Van Mooy,1 Stephanie Wilson11

The oceanic biological pump drives sequestration of carbon dioxide in the deep sea via sinking particles. Rapid biological consumption and remineralization of carbon in the "twilight zone" (depths between the euphotic zone and 1000 meters) reduce the efficiency of sequestration. By using neutrally buoyant sediment traps to sample this chronically understudied realm, we measured a transfer efficiency of sinking particulate organic carbon between 150 and 500 meters of 20 and 50% at two contrasting sites. This large variability in transfer efficiency is poorly represented in biogeochemical models. If applied globally, this is equivalent to a difference in carbon sequestration of more than 3 petagrams of carbon per year.

1 Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
2 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Centre for Physical and Chemical Oceanography, Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
3 Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, 7001, Australia.
4 Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
5 Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
6 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
7 Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, Free University of Brussels, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
8 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Mutsu Institute for Oceanography, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan.
9 Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
10 Ocean Sciences Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
11 Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, USA.
12 Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kbuesseler{at}whoi.edu

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Marine Polyphosphate: A Key Player in Geologic Phosphorus Sequestration.
J. Diaz, E. Ingall, C. Benitez-Nelson, D. Paterson, M. D. de Jonge, I. McNulty, and J. A. Brandes (2008)
Science 320, 652-655
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)