Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
SNM Organization

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 26 May 2006:
Vol. 312. no. 5777, p. 1101
DOI: 10.1126/science.312.5777.1101d

This Week in Science

In the standard Big Bang model, the amount of dark energy in the universe is roughly the same order of magnitude as energy in the form of matter, but this need not have been the case. Dark energy, parameterized as the cosmological constant, could have been trillions of times greater or smaller. This fine tuning has been explained by the anthropic principle--we would not be here if the cosmological parameters had been much different. Steinhardt and Turok (p. 1180, published online 4 May; see the Perspective by Vilenkin) propose an alternative way to tune the cosmological constant down to a small value. They model dark energy in a cyclic universe--a repeating succession of universes growing from big bangs and collapsing into big crunches--and find that most of the time the value of the cosmological constant is small and positive.






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)