Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
GoGreen Membership

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 5 August 2005:
Vol. 309. no. 5736, p. 863
DOI: 10.1126/science.309.5736.863b

ScienceScope

Several science policy experts are criticizing a $550 million program for oil studies created as part of the energy bill passed last week (see story on this page). Three-quarters of the funds in the 11-year program--whose research mission includes drilling, exploration, and other petroleum technology--are to be managed by a "corporation that is a consortium" chosen by the Department of Energy. But Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) says the language is tailor-made for the Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America, an industry group located in the district of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), who supported the measure.

The Bush Administration has sought to cut oil and gas research, but the program will bypass congressional appropriators, drawing its funds directly from oil-lease income the government collects until the money runs out. Economist James Sweeney of Stanford University called the new program "pork" whose funding mechanism could set a harmful precedent for other energy research efforts.






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)