Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Random SamplesTwo articles published this month in the Journal of Economic Perspectives suggest that betting markets can outforecast the polls. In one, Paul Rhode and Koleman Strumpf of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, relate that from 1884 to 1940, when election wagering was wildly popular, bettors correctly picked the winner in every year but 1916, when Woodrow Wilson beat Charles Evans Hughes with a last-minute upset in California. After 1940, because polls were perceived as more scientific, the gambling markets faded from public consciousness, says Strumpf. But the current betting markets--led by Web sites such as www.intrade.com, tradesports.com, and fairbet.com--may outperform opinion polls, according to a paper by Justin Wolfers of the University of Pennsylvania and Eric Zitzewitz of Stanford University. In the last four presidential elections, the University of Iowa's Iowa Electronic Market has averaged an error margin of ±1.5% in the week before the vote, compared with ±2.1% for the Gallup polls. More recently, traders picked John Edwards as John Kerry's running mate 2 months before Kerry did. One reason markets are better at prediction, Strumpf says, is that polls are time-bound snapshots of the public's mood. Thus, for example, candidates always surge in popularity after a convention, but canny bettors know it won't last.
|
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)