Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 6 February 2004:
Vol. 303. no. 5659, pp. 788 - 790
DOI: 10.1126/science.1095480
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Viewpoint

Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century Biologists

William Bialek1,3 and David Botstein2,3*

Galileo wrote that "the book of nature is written in the language of mathematics"; his quantitative approach to understanding the natural world arguably marks the beginning of modern science. Nearly 400 years later, the fragmented teaching of science in our universities still leaves biology outside the quantitative and mathematical culture that has come to define the physical sciences and engineering. This strikes us as particularly inopportune at a time when opportunities for quantitative thinking about biological systems are exploding. We propose that a way out of this dilemma is a unified introductory science curriculum that fully incorporates mathematics and quantitative thinking.

1 Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
2 Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
3 Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: botstein{at}princeton.edu

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Computing Has Changed Biology--Biology Education Must Catch Up.
P. Pevzner and R. Shamir (2009)
Science 325, 541-542
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Enhancing Interdisciplinary, Mathematics, and Physical Science in an Undergraduate Life Science Program through Physical Chemistry.
D. P. Pursell (2009)
CBE Life Sci Educ 8, 15-28
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Thoughts Not Our Own: Whatever Happened to Selective Attention?.
B. M. Stafford (2009)
Theory Culture Society 26, 275-293
   Abstract »    PDF »
An Imaging Roadmap for Biology Education: From Nanoparticles to Whole Organisms.
D. J. Kelley, R. J. Davidson, and D. L. Nelson (2008)
CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 202-209
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Evolving research trends in bioinformatics.
C. Perez-Iratxeta, M. A. Andrade-Navarro, and J. D. Wren (2007)
Brief Bioinform 8, 88-95
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Teaching principles of molecular evolution in an undergraduate bioinformatics course.
B. S. Chapman (2006)
FASEB J 20, A540
   Abstract »    Full Text »
How Effective Are Simulated Molecular-level Experiments for Teaching Diffusion and Osmosis?.
E. Meir, J. Perry, D. Stal, S. Maruca, and E. Klopfer (2005)
CBE Life Sci Educ 4, 235-248
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Examining the architecture of cellular computing through a comparative study with a computer.
D. Wang and M. Gribskov (2005)
J R Soc Interface 2, 187-195
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Points of View: The Interface of Mathematics and Biology: Interdisciplinarity and the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum: Finding a Balance.
L. J. Gross (2004)
CBE Life Sci Educ 3, 85-87
   Full Text »    PDF »
Points of View: The Interface of Mathematics and Biology: Intuition and Innumeracy.
R. Brent (2004)
CBE Life Sci Educ 3, 88-90
   Full Text »    PDF »

E-Letters:

Read all E-Letters

Back to the Future: The 1960s View of Statistics and Mathematics for 21st-Century Biologists
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho, et al.
Science Online, 18 May 2004 [Full text]

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)