Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 16 January 2004:
Vol. 303. no. 5656, pp. 377 - 380
DOI: 10.1126/science.1089401
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Reports

Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate

W. Tecumseh Fitch1* and Marc D. Hauser2

The capacity to generate a limitless range of meaningful expressions from a finite set of elements differentiates human language from other animal communication systems. Rule systems capable of generating an infinite set of outputs ("grammars") vary in generative power. The weakest possess only local organizational principles, with regularities limited to neighboring units. We used a familiarization/discrimination paradigm to demonstrate that monkeys can spontaneously master such grammars. However, human language entails more sophisticated grammars, incorporating hierarchical structure. Monkeys tested with the same methods, syllables, and sequence lengths were unable to master a grammar at this higher, "phrase structure grammar" level.

1 School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AJ, Scotland.
2 Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wtsf{at}st-andrews.ac.uk

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a non-human primate.
A. D. Endress, D. Cahill, S. Block, J. Watumull, and M. D. Hauser (2009)
Biol Lett 5, 749-751
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Where Are the Human Speech and Voice Regions, and Do Other Animals Have Anything Like Them?.
C. I. Petkov, N. K. Logothetis, and J. Obleser (2009)
Neuroscientist 15, 419-429
   Abstract »    PDF »
Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory.
M. Makuuchi, J. Bahlmann, A. Anwander, and A. D. Friederici (2009)
PNAS 106, 8362-8367
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution.
K. Smith and S. Kirby (2008)
Phil Trans R Soc B 363, 3591-3603
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e).
P. K Kuhl, B. T Conboy, S. Coffey-Corina, D. Padden, M. Rivera-Gaxiola, and T. Nelson (2008)
Phil Trans R Soc B 363, 979-1000
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Before and below 'theory of mind': embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition.
V. Gallese (2007)
Phil Trans R Soc B 362, 659-669
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity.
A. D. Friederici, Jör. Bahlmann, S. Heim, R. I. Schubotz, and A. Anwander (2006)
PNAS 103, 2458-2463
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
On the Benefits of not Trying: Brain Activity and Connectivity Reflecting the Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Sequence Learning.
P.C. Fletcher, O. Zafiris, C.D. Frith, R.A.E. Honey, P.R. Corlett, K. Zilles, and G.R. Fink (2005)
Cereb Cortex 15, 1002-1015
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)