Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 17 August 2001:
Vol. 293. no. 5533, pp. 1308 - 1310
DOI: 10.1126/science.1062076

Reports

Queen Control of Sex Ratio in Fire Ants

L. Passera,1 S. Aron,2 E. L. Vargo,3 L. Keller4*

The haplodiploid sex-determination system of ants gives rise to conflict between queens and workers over colony sex ratios, and the female-biased allocation ratios seen in many species suggest that workers often prevail in this conflict. We exchanged queens between male- and female-specialist colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. These exchanges quickly reversed the sex-ratio biases of adopting colonies. The sex ratio of queen-laid eggs differed strongly between male- and female-specialist colonies. These findings suggest that queens can force workers to raise male sexuals by limiting the number of female brood and help to explain why sex investment ratios lie between the queen and worker equilibria in this and many other ant species.

1 Laboratory of Ethology and Animal Cognition, FRE-CNRS 2382, University Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse Cedex 31062, France.
2 Unit of Animal Communities, Free University of Brussels, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
3 Department of Entomology, Campus Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613, USA.
4 Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Laurent.keller{at}ie-zea.unil.ch


Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Patterns of split sex ratio in ants have multiple evolutionary causes based on different within-colony conflicts.
R. Kummerli and L. Keller (2009)
Biol Lett 5, 713-716
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Sex allocation conflict in insect societies: who wins?.
H. Helantera and F. L. W. Ratnieks (2009)
Biol Lett 5, 700-704
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Male elimination in the honeybee.
K. E. Wharton, F. C. Dyer, and T. Getty (2008)
Behav. Ecol. 19, 1075-1079
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Split sex ratios in the social Hymenoptera: a meta-analysis.
J. Meunier, S. A. West, and M. Chapuisat (2008)
Behav. Ecol. 19, 382-390
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Experimental manipulation of queen number affects colony sex ratio investment in the highly polygynous ant Formica exsecta.
R. Kummerli, K. R Helms, and L. Keller (2005)
Proc R Soc B 272, 1789-1794
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Information constraints and the precision of adaptation: Sex ratio manipulation in wasps.
D. M. Shuker and S. A. West (2004)
PNAS 101, 10363-10367
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Genome Evolution in an Insect Cell: Distinct Features of an Ant-Bacterial Partnership.
J. J. Wernegreen, P. H. Degnan, A. B. Lazarus, C. Palacios, and S. R. Bordenstein (2003)
Biol. Bull. 204, 221-231
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Many Selves of Social Insects.
D. C. Queller and J. E. Strassmann (2002)
Science 296, 311-313
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)