Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Invitrogen

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 2 February 2001:
Vol. 291. no. 5505, pp. 864 - 868
DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5505.864

Reports

Scale Dependence in Plant Biodiversity

M. J. Crawley,* J. E. Harral

The relationship between the number of species and the area sampled is one of the oldest and best-documented patterns in community ecology. Several theoretical models and field data from a wide range of plant and animal taxa suggest that the slope, z, of a graph of the logarithm of species richness against the logarithm of area is roughly constant, with z approx  0.25. We collected replicated and randomized plant data at 11 spatial scales from 0.01 to 108 square meters in Great Britain which show that the slope of the log-log plot is not constant, but varies systematically with spatial scale, and from habitat to habitat at the same spatial scale. Values of z were low (0.1 to 0.2) at small scales (<100 square meters), high (0.4 to 0.5) at intermediate scales (1 hectare to 10 square kilometers), and low again (0.1 to 0.2) for the largest scale transitions (e.g., East Berks to all of Berkshire). Instead of one process determining changes in species richness across a wide range of scales, different processes might determine plant biodiversity at different spatial scales.

Department of Biology, Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.crawley{at}ic.ac.uk


Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Putting the Plants Back into Plant Ecology: Six Pragmatic Models for Understanding and Conserving Plant Diversity.
P. KEDDY (2005)
Ann. Bot. 96, 177-189
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Phytoplankton species richness scales consistently from laboratory microcosms to the world's oceans.
V. H. Smith, B. L. Foster, J. P. Grover, R. D. Holt, M. A. Leibold, and F. deNoyelles Jr. (2005)
PNAS 102, 4393-4396
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Plant Species Diversity and Management of Temperate Forage and Grazing Land Ecosystems.
M. A. Sanderson, R. H. Skinner, D. J. Barker, G. R. Edwards, B. F. Tracy, and D. A. Wedin (2004)
Crop Sci. 44, 1132-1144
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Extinction rates under nonrandom patterns of habitat loss.
E. W. Seabloom, A. P. Dobson, and D. M. Stoms (2002)
PNAS 99, 11229-11234
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)