Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 14 April 2000:
Vol. 288. no. 5464, pp. 349 - 351
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5464.349
Prev | Table of Contents

Reports

Language Discrimination by Human Newborns and by Cotton-Top Tamarin Monkeys

Franck Ramus, 1*dagger Marc D. Hauser, 2 Cory Miller, 2 Dylan Morris, 2 Jacques Mehler 1

Humans, but no other animal, make meaningful use of spoken language. What is unclear, however, is whether this capacity depends on a unique constellation of perceptual and neurobiological mechanisms or whether a subset of such mechanisms is shared with other organisms. To explore this problem, parallel experiments were conducted on human newborns and cotton-top tamarin monkeys to assess their ability to discriminate unfamiliar languages. A habituation-dishabituation procedure was used to show that human newborns and tamarins can discriminate sentences from Dutch and Japanese but not if the sentences are played backward. Moreover, the cues for discrimination are not present in backward speech. This suggests that the human newborns' tuning to certain properties of speech relies on general processes of the primate auditory system.

1 Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 54 Boulevard Raspail, 75006 Paris, France.
2 Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
*   To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: f.ramus{at}ucl.ac.uk

dagger    Present address: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK.

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a non-human primate.
A. D. Endress, D. Cahill, S. Block, J. Watumull, and M. D. Hauser (2009)
Biol Lett
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants.
A. M. Kovacs and J. Mehler (2009)
PNAS 106, 6556-6560
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Voice processing in human and non-human primates.
P. Belin (2006)
Phil Trans R Soc B 361, 2091-2107
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Measures of Native and Non-Native Rhythm in a Quantity Language.
V. Stockmal, D. Markus, and D. Bond (2005)
Language and Speech 48, 55-63
   Abstract »    PDF »
Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate.
W. T. Fitch and M. D. Hauser (2004)
Science 303, 377-380
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth.
M. Pena, A. Maki, D. Kovacic, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, H. Koizumi, F. Bouquet, and J. Mehler (2003)
PNAS 100, 11702-11705
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Functional Neuroimaging of Speech Perception in Infants.
G. Dehaene-Lambertz, S. Dehaene, and L. Hertz-Pannier (2002)
Science 298, 2013-2015
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?.
M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch (2002)
Science 298, 1569-1579
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy.
P. J Bailey and M. J Snowling (2002)
Br. Med. Bull. 63, 135-146
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Neurocognitive deficits in infants of mothers with schizophrenia.
E. H. Friedman (2000)
The British Journal of Psychiatry 177 , 564b-565b
   Full Text »
A new view of language acquisition.
P. K. Kuhl (2000)
PNAS 97, 11850-11857
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)