Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 5 November 1999:
Vol. 286. no. 5442, pp. 1074 - 1076
DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1074a

News Focus

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH:
NIH Eyes Sweeping Reform of Peer Review

Bruce Agnew

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is in the midst of a major drive to refurbish its peer-review system--updating it to fit today's biomedical science, setting standards of behavior to improve peer reviewers' manners and methods, and creating a mechanism to ensure that peer review will adapt as science evolves in the future. In the most dramatic reform proposal so far, a blue-ribbon panel headed by National Academy of Sciences president Bruce Alberts wants to completely restructure the array of study sections operated by NIH's Center for Scientific Review, which pass judgment on about three-quarters of NIH grant applications. But the changes that will finally emerge, after they are refined and tested over the next 2 or 3 years, may be considerably less sweeping than the Alberts panel blueprint.

Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)