Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Click Me!

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 16 October 1998:
Vol. 282. no. 5388, p. 415
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5388.415a

Letters

This Week's Letters

A reader points out a major role for science and engineering suggested in the recently released U.S. House of Representatives report on national science policy. The role of the U.S. Department of Defense in funding academic basic research is lauded. Proposed animal experimentation regulation in India is discussed. Standards for expert engineer witnesses are debated. A reader writes: "Reliance on experience and judgment in decisions that affect lives of others sets engineering and medicine apart from science." And two views of who should own scientific papers are presented.


Letters in This Issue

space space
[Letter] Environmental Decision-Making
Peter D. Saundry
[Letter] Animal Experimentation Rules in India
Sandip K. Basu and Satyajit Rath
[Letter] DOD: A Critical Funder and Risk-Taker
Rustam Roy
[Letter] Standards for Engineer Witnesses
Michael D. Green; George W. Pearsall; Norman W. Edmund
[Letter] The Copyright Issue
E. Peter Geiduschek; Jens Bammel
[Letter] Corrections and Clarifications



How to Submit a Letter to the Editor





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT

To Advertise     Find Products