Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 2 June 1989:
Vol. 244. no. 4908, pp. 1046 - 1050
DOI: 10.1126/science.244.4908.1046

Articles

Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making

ROBERT J. MACCOUN 1

1 Social psychologist in the Behavioral Sciences Department at The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90406-2138.

Because trial juries deliberate in secrecy, legal debates about jury functioning have relied heavily on anecdote and speculation. In recent years, investigators have begun to challenge many common assumptions about jury behavior. An important tool in this effort has been the mock jury experiment, in which research participants are randomly assigned to alternative trial conditions and asked to reach a verdict in a simulated case. Researchers have used mock jury experiments to test hypotheses about causal influences on jury behavior and to develop theoretical models of the jury deliberation process.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
When Should Political Scientists Use the Self-Confirming Equilibrium Concept? Benefits, Costs, and an Application to Jury Theorems.
A. Lupia, A. S. Levine, and N. Zharinova (2009)
Political Analysis
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Small group processes relevant to data monitoring committees in controlled clinical trials: an overview of reviews.
A. E Walker, S. K McLeer, and DAMOCLES group (2004)
Clinical Trials 1, 282-296
   Abstract »    PDF »
Effect of inotropic interventions on contraction and Ca2+ transients in the human heart.
K. Brixius, M. Pietsch, S. Hoischen, J. Muller-Ehmsen, and R. H. G. Schwinger (1997)
J Appl Physiol 83, 652-660
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Medicolegal Analysis of the Delayed Diagnosis of Cancer in 338 Cases in the United States.
K. A. Kern (1994)
Arch Surg 129, 397-404
   Abstract »    PDF »
The Emergence of Extralegal BIAS During Jury Deliberation.
R. J. MacCOUN (1990)
Criminal Justice and Behavior 17, 303-314
   Abstract »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)