Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 19 June 1987:
Vol. 236. no. 4808, pp. 1527 - 1532
DOI: 10.1126/science.236.4808.1527

Articles

Measurement Scales on the Continuum

R. DUNCAN LUCE 1 and LOUIS NARENS 2

1 Victor S. Thomas professor of psychology at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
2 Professor of social science at the University of California at Irvine, CA 92717.

In a seminal article in 1946, S. S. Stevens noted that the numerical measures then in common use exhibited three admissible groups of transformations: similarity, affine, and monotonic. Until recently, it was unclear what other scale types are possible. For situations on the continuum that are homogeneous (that is, objects are not distinguishable by their properties), the possibilities are essentially these three plus another type lying between the first two. These types lead to clearly described classes of structures that can, in principle, be incorporated into the classical structure of physical units. Such results, along with characterizations of important special cases, are potentially useful in the behavioral and social sciences.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Measures of Association: How to Choose?.
H. Khamis (2008)
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 24, 155-162
   Abstract »    PDF »
Computerized Measurement of Motor Performance After Stroke.
S. C. Cramer, G. Nelles, J. D. Schaechter, J. D. Kaplan, and S. P. Finklestein (1997)
Stroke 28, 2162-2168
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Proportions, Pitfalls and Pendulums.
T. Micceri (1990)
Educational and Psychological Measurement 50, 769-774
   Abstract »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)