Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 5 August 1983:
Vol. 221. no. 4610, pp. 558 - 560
DOI: 10.1126/science.221.4610.558

Articles

Intraspecific Deception by Bluffing: A Defense Strategy of Newly Molted Stomatopods (Arthropoda: Crustacea)

RICK STEGER 1 and ROY L. CALDWELL 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley 94720

After molting, stomatopods can be evicted easily from home cavities by conspecifics because these marine crustaceans lose temporarily their body armor and the use of their raptorial appendages. Some newly molted stomatopods defend their cavities with a meral spread display, a signal correlated with attack when used by animals between molts. The use of the meral spread display actually increases after molting. Since new molts cannot fight, their use of meral spread appears to be a bluff.

Submitted on September 7, 1982
Revised on January 28, 1983


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Mechanical properties of the rigid and hydrostatic skeletons of molting blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun.
J. R. A. Taylor, J. Hebrank, and W. M. Kier (2007)
J. Exp. Biol. 210, 4272-4278
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
From the Cover: Ground squirrels use an infrared signal to deter rattlesnake predation.
A. S. Rundus, D. H. Owings, S. S. Joshi, E. Chinn, and N. Giannini (2007)
PNAS 104, 14372-14376
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Switching Skeletons: Hydrostatic Support in Molting Crabs.
J. R. A. Taylor and W. M. Kier (2003)
Science 301, 209-210
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Deception with honest signals: signal residuals and signal function in snapping shrimp.
M. Hughes (2000)
Behav. Ecol. 11, 614-623
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Male green frogs lower the pitch of acoustic signals in defense of territories: a possible dishonest signal of size?.
M. A. Bee, S. A. Perrill, and P. C. Owen (2000)
Behav. Ecol. 11, 169-177
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)