Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 19 June 1981:
Vol. 212. no. 4501, pp. 1409 - 1411
DOI: 10.1126/science.7233231

Articles

Science, Vol 212, Issue 4501, 1409-1411
Copyright © 1981 by American Association for the Advancement of Science


articles

Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex

DA Pollen and SF Ronner

Adjacent simple cells recorded and "isolated" simultaneously from the same microelectrode placement were usually tuned to the same orientation and spatial frequency. The responses of the members of these "spatial frequency pairs" to drifting sine-wave gratings were cross-correlates. Within the middle range of the spatial frequency selectivity curves, the responses of the paired cells differed in phase by approximately 90 percent. This phase relationship suggests that adjacent simple cells tuned to the same spatial frequency and orientation represent paired sine and cosine filters in terms of their processing of afferent spatial inputs and truncated sine and cosine filters in terms of the output of simple cells.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Cone Inputs in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex.
E. N. Johnson, M. J. Hawken, and R. Shapley (2004)
J Neurophysiol 91, 2501-2514
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Functional Connectivity of Disparity-Tuned Neurons in the Visual Cortex.
M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman (2004)
J Neurophysiol 91, 1794-1807
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
How does the cerebral cortex work? development, learning, attention, and 3-D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex..
S. Grossberg (2003)
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2, 47-76
   Abstract »    PDF »
Isolation of Relevant Visual Features from Random Stimuli for Cortical Complex Cells.
J. Touryan, B. Lau, and Y. Dan (2002)
J. Neurosci. 22, 10811-10818
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase.
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman (1999)
J Neurophysiol 82, 874-890
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information II. Complex Cells.
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman (1999)
J Neurophysiol 82, 909-924
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons.
G. C. DeAngelis, G. M. Ghose, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman (1999)
J. Neurosci. 19, 4046-4064
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Inhibitory Contributions to Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure and Direction Selectivity in Simple Cells of Cat Area 17.
A. Murthy and A. L. Humphrey (1999)
J Neurophysiol 81, 1212-1224
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex.
M. Carandini, D. J. Heeger, and J. A. Movshon (1997)
J. Neurosci. 17, 8621-8644
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Encoding of Binocular Disparity by Complex Cells in the Cat's Visual Cortex.
I. Ohzawa, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman (1997)
J Neurophysiol 77, 2879-2909
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex.
T. Albright (1992)
Science 255, 1141-1143
   Abstract »    PDF »
Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.
I Ohzawa, G. DeAngelis, and R. Freeman (1990)
Science 249, 1037-1041
   Abstract »    PDF »
Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion.
M Shadlen and T Carney (1986)
Science 232, 95-97
   Abstract »    PDF »



To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)