Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 21 November 1980:
Vol. 210. no. 4472, pp. 851 - 860
DOI: 10.1126/science.210.4472.851

Articles

Is the Proton Stable

M. Goldhaber 1, P. Langacker 2, and R. Slansky 3

1 AUI Distinguished Scientist at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Associated Universities, Incorporated, Upton, New York 11973
2 Assistant professor in the Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104
3 Member of the staff in the Theoretical Division, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, University of California, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

For nearly 50 years there has been a strong belief that the proton is absolutely stable. The current experimental upper bound on its decay rate is less than one proton decay per 3 tons of matter per year, which corresponds to a mean lifetime of more than 1030 years. Even more sensitive searches for proton decay are now in progress. These are partially motivated by the development of a class of models that combine the presently accepted theories of electromagnetic, weak, and strong inter-actions into an elegant unified form. Some of these theories predict a proton lifetime short enough for the decays to be detectable by the proposed experiments. If the proton is unstable, a plausible explanation can be given for the apparent excess of matter over antimatter in the universe.





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)