Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Science 9 January 1970:
Vol. 167. no. 3915, pp. 193 - 195
DOI: 10.1126/science.167.3915.193
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Articles

White Pine Blister Rust: Simply Inherited Resistance in Sugar Pine

Bohun B. Kinloch Jr. 1, Gaylord K. Parks 2, and Carl W. Fowler 2

1 Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, California 94701
2 Eldorado National Forest, Placerville, California 95667

Segregation ratios of offspring from disease-free sugar pines suggest that resistance to the white pine blister rust fungus is under major gene control and simply inherited.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Genetic diversity, structure, and demographic change in tanoak, Lithocarpus densiflorus (Fagaceae), the most susceptible species to sudden oak death in California.
A. Nettel, R. S. Dodd, and Z. Afzal-Rafii (2009)
Am. J. Botany 96, 2224-2233
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cultured Cells of White Pine Show Genetic Resistance to Axenic Blister Rust Hyphae.
A. M. DINER, R. L. MOTT, and H. V. AMERSON (1984)
Science 224, 407-408
   Abstract »    PDF »


To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)