Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Submitted on October 5, 2004
Accepted on November 30, 2004
Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature
Rhys E. Green 1*, Stephen J. Cornell 2, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann 1, Andrew Balmford 3
1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2DL, UK. 2 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK; The Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. 3 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK; Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Rhys E. Green , E-mail: reg29{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk
World food demand is expected to more than double by 2050. Decisionsabout how to meet this challenge will have profound effectson wild species and habitats. We show that farming is alreadythe greatest extinction threat to birds (the best known taxon),and its adverse impacts look set to increase, especially indeveloping countries. Two competing solutions have been proposed:wildlife-friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populationson farmland, but may decrease agricultural yields), and land-sparing(which minimises demand for farmland by increasing yield). Wepresent a model that identifies how to resolve the trade-offbetween these approaches. This shows that the best type of farmingfor species persistence depends on the demand for agriculturalproducts and on how the population densities of different specieson farmland change with agricultural yield. Empirical data onsuch density-yield functions are sparse, but evidence from arange of taxa in developing countries suggests that high-yieldfarming may allow more species to persist.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
LETTERS
John Vandermeer, Ivette Perfecto;, Rhys E. Green, Stephen J. Cornell, Jörn P. W. Scharlemann, and Andrew Balmford (27 May 2005) Science308 (5726), 1257b.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.308.5726.1257b] |Full Text »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad.
Biodiversity Conservation and the Millennium Development Goals.
J. D. Sachs, J. E. M. Baillie, W. J. Sutherland, P. R. Armsworth, N. Ash, J. Beddington, T. M. Blackburn, B. Collen, B. Gardiner, K. J. Gaston, et al. (2009)
Science
325, 1502-1503
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region.
F. Eigenbrod, B. J. Anderson, P. R. Armsworth, A. Heinemeyer, S. F. Jackson, M. Parnell, C. D. Thomas, and K. J. Gaston (2009)
Proc R Soc B
276, 2903-2911
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Bioeconomic Sustainability of Cellulosic Biofuel Production on Marginal Lands.
A. P. Gutierrez and L. Ponti (2009)
Bulletin of Science Technology Society
29, 213-225
|Abstract »|PDF »
On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe.
D Kleijn, F Kohler, A Baldi, P Batary, E.D Concepcion, Y Clough, M Diaz, D Gabriel, A Holzschuh, E Knop, et al. (2009)
Proc R Soc B
276, 903-909
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Mining and Harnessing Natural Variation: A Little MAGIC.
G. S. Johal, P. Balint-Kurti, and C. F. Weil (2008)
Crop Sci.
48, 2066-2073
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Flight distance and population trends in European breeding birds.
Mitigation of indirect environmental effects of GM crops.
J.D Pidgeon, M.J May, J.N Perry, and G.M Poppy (2007)
Proc R Soc B
274, 1475-1479
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Comparison of Long-Term Organic and Conventional Crop-Livestock Systems on a Previously Nutrient-Depleted Soil in Sweden.
H. Kirchmann, L. Bergstrom, T. Katterer, L. Mattsson, and S. Gesslein (2007)
Agron. J.
99, 960-972
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
From the Cover: Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification.
I. Steffan-Dewenter, M. Kessler, J. Barkmann, M. M. Bos, D. Buchori, S. Erasmi, H. Faust, G. Gerold, K. Glenk, S. R. Gradstein, et al. (2007)
PNAS
104, 4973-4978
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture.
Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon.
D. C. Morton, R. S. DeFries, Y. E. Shimabukuro, L. O. Anderson, E. Arai, F. del Bon Espirito-Santo, R. Freitas, and J. Morisette (2006)
PNAS
103, 14637-14641
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Utilization: The Accomplishments and Future of a Societal Insurance Policy.