Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Submitted on March 31, 2003
Accepted on May 28, 2003
Estimating the Rock Volume Bias in Paleobiodiversity Studies
James S. Crampton 1*,Alan G. Beu 1,Roger A. Cooper 1,Craig M. Jones 1,Bruce Marshall 2,Phillip A. Maxwell 3
1 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. 2 Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Post Office Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand. 3 Bathgates Road, R.D. 10, Waimate, South Canterbury, New Zealand.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.crampton{at}gns.cri.nz.
In order to interpret changes in biodiversity through geologicaltime, it is necessary first to correct for biases in samplingeffort related to variations in the exposure of rocks and recoveryof fossils with age. Data from New Zealand indicate that outcroparea is likely to be a reliable proxy of rock volume in bothstable cratonic regions, where the paleobiodiversity recordis strongly correlated with relative sea-level, and on tectonicallyactive margins. In contrast, another potential proxy, the numberof rock formations, is a poor predictor of outcrop area or samplingeffort in the New Zealand case.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
PERSPECTIVES
Andrew B. Smith (18 July 2003) Science301 (5631), 321.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1086420] |Summary »|Full Text »|PDF »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Latitudinal selectivity of foraminifer extinctions during the late Guadalupian crisis.
Phanerozoic Trends in the Global Diversity of Marine Invertebrates.
J. Alroy, M. Aberhan, D. J. Bottjer, M. Foote, F. T. Fursich, P. J. Harries, A. J. W. Hendy, S. M. Holland, L. C. Ivany, W. Kiessling, et al. (2008)
Science
321, 97-100
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Are global Phanerozoic marine diversity curves truly global? A study of the relationship between regional rock records and global Phanerozoic marine diversity.
Rise and Fall of Species Occupancy in Cenozoic Fossil Mollusks.
M. Foote, J. S. Crampton, A. G. Beu, B. A. Marshall, R. A. Cooper, P. A. Maxwell, and I. Matcham (2007)
Science
318, 1131-1134
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Marine diversity through the Phanerozoic: problems and prospects.
SEA-LEVEL CHANGE AND THE STRUCTURE OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS.
S. DOMINICI and M. ZUSCHIN (2007)
Palaios
22, 225-227
|Full Text »|PDF »
Intrinsic versus extrinsic biases in the fossil record: contrasting the fossil record of echinoids in the Triassic and early Jurassic using sampling data, phylogenetic analysis, and molecular clocks.
The ark was full! Constant to declining Cenozoic shallow marine biodiversity on an isolated midlatitude continent.
J. S. Crampton, M. Foote, A. G. Beu, P. A. Maxwell, R. A. Cooper, I. Matcham, B. A. Marshall, and C. M. Jones (2006)
Paleobiology
32, 509-532
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Assessing the fidelity of the fossil record by using marine bivalves.
J. W. Valentine, D. Jablonski, S. Kidwell, and K. Roy (2006)
PNAS
103, 6599-6604
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Completeness of the fossil record: Estimating losses due to small body size.
R. A. Cooper, P. A. Maxwell, J. S. Crampton, A. G. Beu, C. M. Jones, and B. A. Marshall (2006)
Geology
34, 241-244
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Second-Order Sequence Stratigraphic Controls on the Quality of the Fossil Record at an Active Margin: New Zealand Eocene to Recent Shelf Molluscs.
J. S. CRAMPTON, M. FOOTE, A. G. BEU, R. A. COOPER, I. MATCHAM, C. M. JONES, P. A. MAXWELL, and B. A. MARSHALL (2006)
Palaios
21, 86-105
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Cyclicity in the fossil record mirrors rock outcrop area.