Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Technical CommentsComment on "Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change"
We disagree with the conclusion of Le Quéré et al. (Reports, 22 June 2007, p. 1735) that poleward intensifying winds could continue to weaken the Southern Ocean sink in the future. We argue that altered winds, along with rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, will likely increase the efficiency of this sink in the 21st century.
1 School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada.
2 Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zickfeld{at}ocean.seos.uvic.ca
Le Quéré et al. (1) recently concluded that the strengthening and poleward shifting of extratropical Southern Hemisphere winds observed over recent decades is likely to have weakened the Southern Ocean sink of CO2. This finding is of great relevance in the context of climate change, as the Southern Ocean accounts for At present, the strong westerlies over the Southern Ocean drive a northward Ekman transport, which constitutes the surface branch of a meridional overturning circulation, the Deacon cell. Ekman-driven upwelling in the Antarctic Divergence (i.e., the region <55°S) exposes deep waters with elevated concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) to the surface, leading to outgassing of natural CO2 to the atmosphere. At the same time, anthropogenic CO2 is sequestered in the downwelling branch of the Deacon cell, in association with the formation of mode and intermediate waters (5). Strengthening of the Southern Hemisphere westerlies enhances the rate of meridional over-turning and hence influences the processes regulating the exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere and the Southern Ocean. To illustrate the effect of altered winds on the air-sea flux of CO2 in the Southern Ocean, we draw on simulations with the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic-ESCM) (6), aspects of which were reported in Zickfeld et al. (7, 8). The UVic-ESCM includes a state-of-the-art representation of the marine and terrestrial carbon cycle. Over the historical period (1800 to 2005), the model simulates an increase in atmospheric CO2 of 212 Pg C, which is close to the observed value (9). The atmospheric CO2 increase is 3.7 Pg C year–1 for the 1990s and 4.1 Pg C year–1 for 2000 to 2005, in good agreement with observation-based estimates (10). Global oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 is 1.8 Pg C year–1 for the 1980s and 2.2 Pg C year–1 for the 1990s, in excellent agreement with (10). The global oceanic sink of anthropogenic CO2 for 1800 to 1994 is 105 Pg C, which is within the error bar of Sabine et al. (2). The fluxes of natural and anthropogenic CO2 in the Southern Ocean agree with inverse model estimates (3, 11). Figure 1 shows the modeled effect of poleward intensifying winds on the air-sea flux of natural and total (i.e., natural + anthropogenic) CO2 for the period between 1900 and 2100. For the case of natural carbon (Fig. 1A), it is evident that more intense winds over the Southern Ocean lead to increased ventilation of natural CO2 south of 55°S and increased uptake in the mode water formation region (55°S to 40°S) throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. Both effects are associated with the higher rate of meridional overturning, leading to stronger upwelling of deep, DIC-rich waters south of 55°S and stronger subduction north of 55°S (7). As the anomalous outgassing of natural carbon dominates, the total wind effect is a weakening of the Southern Ocean sink (Fig. 1C).
In the case of total CO2 flux, the time evolution is more complex. Initially, altered winds lead to anomalous outgassing of CO2 and, from the end of the 20th century on, to anomalous uptake of CO2 in the upwelling region (Fig. 1B). The initial trend toward enhanced outgassing is in agreement with the results of Le Quéré et al. (1), although the timing is different. We find a significant negative trend (more outgassing with time) between 1850 and 1950 (–0.0011 ± 0.0001 Pg C year–1 decade–1) and a significant positive trend (less outgassing with time) from 1950 to 2000 (0.0053 ± 0.0005 Pg C year–1 decade–1) (Fig. 1C), which is in contrast to the findings by Le Quéré et al. (1) of a negative trend between 1980 and 2004. This difference is not surprising because we use modeled instead of observed winds over the historical period. However, the focus of our comment is not so much on the timing of the trend reversal, which is certainly model-dependent, as on the fact that this reversal occurs at all. The reversing effect of the poleward intensifying winds, acting initially to weaken and then to strengthen the uptake of CO2 in the Southern Ocean, can be explained as follows: As anthropogenic CO2 builds up in the atmosphere, the deep, older waters are exposed to higher atmospheric CO2 levels, so that stronger upwelling is associated with simultaneous natural CO2 out-gassing and anthropogenic CO2 uptake anomalies (5, 7). Until about 1980, the anomalous outgassing of natural carbon is the dominant mechanism, so that despite the uptake anomaly between 55°S and 40°S, stronger winds act to weaken the Southern Ocean CO2 sink, as described by Le Quéré et al. (1). However, as CO2 concentrations continue to rise, the effect on uptake of anthropogenic CO2 dominates, resulting in a more efficient Southern Ocean sink (7). We thus suggest that the current trend toward a weakening of the Southern Ocean sink reported by Le Quéré et al. (1) may not be indicative for the future. We rather suggest that a continuing poleward intensification of the Southern Hemisphere winds, along with rising atmospheric CO2 levels, will likely increase the efficiency of Southern Ocean carbon uptake, providing for a small negative feedback on atmospheric CO2.
Received for publication 22 June 2007. Accepted for publication 28 December 2007.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:In Science Magazine
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
|
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)