Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Science Careers Booklet

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 18 June 2004:
Vol. 304. no. 5678, p. 1745
DOI: 10.1126/science.1098080

Technical Comments

Comment on "Impacts of Fine Root Turnover on Forest NPP and Soil C Sequestration Potential"

Matamala et al. (1) recently highlighted the importance of estimating mean residence time (MRT) of fine root C for understanding soil C dynamics. Using isotopic signals of 13C from two CO2 experiments as a tracer, they estimated MRT of C through fine roots that ranged from 1.20 to 6.25 years. They obtained these MRT values by fitting an exponential equation to the 13C data with a one-pool model that assumed that newly synthesized C is immediately used for fine root growth.

Actually, however, photosyntheically fixed C is first incorporated into the plant C pool to mix with stored nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC), from which root growth draws C. Thus, the interpretation of isotope data needs to consider NSC storage (2) and to use a two-pool model—that is, one that includes both NSC and fine roots. We developed such a model (3) and estimated MRT of fine roots from the isotope data presented by Matamala et al. The resulting MRT values that we derive from this model are 2.37 years for pine roots of <1 mm, 2.01 years for pine roots of 1 to 2 mm, and 6.06 years for pine roots of 2 to 5 mm (4), shorter by 44.5%, 64.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, than the estimates in (1). For sweetgum roots of <1 mm and 1 to 2 mm, the two-pool model gives estimated MRTs of 1.19 and 1.32 years, respectively— 0.8% and 56.0% less than the Matamala et al. estimates (1).

Whereas the sums of MRT of fine roots and plant NSC estimated from our two-pool model are similar to the estimates from the one-pool model (1), separating plant NSC from fine root MRT will lead to estimates of soil C sequestration that are different from those of Matamala et al. (1). In addition, data points immediately after CO2 fumigation, which are absent for approximately 10 months of that study, are particularly important for estimation of MRT of plant NSC and need to be collected in future studies.

Yiqi Luo*
Department of Botany and Microbiology
University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK 73019, USA
and Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology
Fudan University
Shanghai, China

Luther White
Department of Mathematics
University of Oklahoma

Dafeng Hui
Department of Botany and Microbiology
University of Oklahoma


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yluo{at}ou.edu


References and Notes

  • 1. R. Matamala, M. A. Gonzàlez-Meler, J. D. Jastrow, R. J. Norby, W. H. Schlesinger, Science 302, 1385 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • 2. Y. Luo, Global Change Biol. 9, 1118 (2003). [CrossRef]
  • 3. The two-pool model is , where F(t) is old C remaining at time t, and {alpha} and ß are mean residence times of NSC in plant and fine roots, respectively (5).
  • 4. When we used data from the root ingrowth cores placed 10 months after the initiation of the CO2 experiments and harvested 24 months after the initiation of the CO2 experiments to constrain the estimation of MRT of plant NSC, the estimated MRT of fine roots with the two-pool model was still substantially smaller than the value using the one-pool model.
  • 5. Y. Luo, L. White, unpublished data.
Received for publication 8 March 2004. Accepted for publication 26 May 2004.






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs