Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 1 February 2002:
Vol. 295. no. 5556, pp. 838 - 841
DOI: 10.1126/science.1065835


Abstract
Full Text
Evidence for Strengthening of the Tropical General Circulation in the 1990s
Junye Chen, Barbara E. Carlson, and Anthony D. Del Genio

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figure 1. The spatial distribution of LW flux changes. The color bar indicates ERBE WFOV data local linear trends, that is, changes in flux from January 1985 to August 1995. The contours indicate long-term mean LW flux values. The units are W m-2 for both the color bar and the contours.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 2. The first mode of the combined JFD EOF for the subtropical region data. This mode accounts for 9.3% of the total variance. (A) The PC time series (red line) and the 30°S-30°N mean LW flux anomalies (green line). The CC between the PC and the LW anomalies is 0.79, and the PC trend is confident at the 99% level (33). The JFD patterns: (B) cloud amount - LW flux; (C) UTH - LW flux; (D) SW flux - LW flux; (E) 500 hPa Omega - LW flux; (F) SAT - LW flux.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 3. The second mode of the combined JFD EOF for the equatorial region data. This mode accounts for 5.5% of the total variance. (A) The PC time series (red line) and the 30°S-30°N mean LW flux anomalies (green line). The CC between the PC and the LW anomalies is 0.64, and the PC trend is confident at the 89% level. The JFD patterns: (B) cloud amount - LW flux; (C) UTH - LW flux; (D) SW flux - LW flux; (E) 500 hPa Omega - LW flux; (F) SAT - LW flux.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental note: The impressions of SAT-LW changes in the subtropical and equatorial regions (Supplemental Figs. 2F and Fig. 3F) are different for two reasons: (1) The much larger LW changes in the subtropics dominate the JFD anomaly pattern there. (2) Part of the subtropical SAT increase occurs at extreme high SAT values not present in the equatorial region. Nonetheless, mean SAT increases by similar amounts, 0.083(C, in the subtropical and equatorial regions.





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)