Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 7 December 2001:
Vol. 294. no. 5549, pp. 2127 - 2130
DOI: 10.1126/science.1065467


Abstract
Full Text
Cell Proliferation Without Neurogenesis in Adult Primate Neocortex
D. R. Kornack and P. Rakic

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table 1. Experimental schedule. Animals #1-5 received 50 mg BrdU/ kg body weight per injection, animal #6 received 100 mg/kg per injection, and animals #7-10 received 75 mg/kg per injection. Dates of birth were available for animals #6-10; animals #1-5 were postpubertal and estimated to be between 5 and 10 years old on the basis of body weights and physical condition.
Animal no.SpeciesSexAge (yrs)BrdU injectionsPost-inject. survival timeImmunostain
1M. fascicularisF5-1012 hrperoxidase
2M. fascicularisF5-1052 hrperoxidase
3M. fascicularisM5-10512 dperoxidase
4M. fascicularisM5-10531 dperoxidase
5M. fascicularisM5-10575 dperoxidase
6M. mulattaM5410 dfluorescence
7M. mulattaF122 (5 days apart)21 dfluorescence
8M. mulattaM8532 dfluorescence
9M. mulattaF5575 dfluorescence
10M. mulattaM5597 dfluorescence


Supplementary information on the methods:

For immunoperoxidase staining, animals were anaesthetized and perfused with 70% ethanol, and brains were blocked and postfixed overnight at 4°C. Blocks were dehydrated in graded alcohol solutions, cleared in xylene, embedded in paraffin, and serially sectioned at either 8 or 10 namem in the coronal plane. Sections were mounted on glass slides and processed for BrdU immunoperoxidase as described previously [D.R. Kornack, P. Rakic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1241 (1998)]. Briefly, rehydrated sections were placed in 2 N HCl for 1 hr, rinsed, and incubated with a mouse anti-BrdU antibody (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA; 1:100) for 30 min at room temperature. The antibody was visualized using a biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; 1:200), the Vector ABC Elite kit, and H2O2/diaminobenzidine (DAB) with 0.02% cobalt chloride and 0.02% nickel ammonium sulfate to yield a black reaction product. Sections were counterstained using 0.1% basic fuchsin.

For immunofluorescence triple-labeling for BrdU and cell-type markers, we perfused with 0.9% saline, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M PB, pH 7.4. Blocks of brain tissue were postfixed in PFA-PB for 6 hrs at 4 °C, then sunk in graded sucrose solutions to 30%. Blocks were frozen, and coronal cryostat sections (30 or 40-namem) were placed in PBS and immediately processed as previously described [D.R. Kornack, P. Rakic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4752 (2001)]. To detect BrdU, the free-floating sections were pretreated to denature DNA by the following steps: 2 hr incubation in 50% formamide/2 X SSC at 65 °C; 5 min rinse in 2 X SSC; 30 min incubation in 2 N HCl at 37 °C, and 10 min rinse in 0.1 M boric acid, pH 8.5. Sections were then blocked and incubated for 48 hrs at 4 °C with a pooled solution of rat anti-BrdU antibody (Accurate Scientific, Westbury, NY; 1:100), rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA; 1:1000) and either mouse anti-NeuN antibody (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA; 1:125) or mouse anti-class III name-tubulin antibody (TuJ1; a kind gift from Dr. A. Frankfurter, University of Virginia; 1:400). After rinsing in blocking buffer, sections were incubated for 2 hrs in a pooled solution of Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG, Alexa 568-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (both from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; 1:500) and Cy5-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA; 1:200). Sections were mounted and coverslipped with mounting medium. Omitting primary antibodies from the immunohistochemistry processing steps eliminated fluorescence or peroxidase labeling of cells.

Brightfield images were obtained using a CCD camera mounted on a Zeiss microscope. Fluorescent signals were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). For obtaining confocal micrographs, each fluorochrome dye within the same field was scanned separately using a quasi-simultaneous mode; this eliminates the possibility of signal "bleeding", which could generate false positive results. For imaging, the emission signals of Alexa-488, Alexa-568 and Cy5 were assigned to the green, red, and blue channels, respectively.





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)