Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
SNM Organization

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 12 October 2001:
Vol. 294. no. 5541, pp. 366 - 368
DOI: 10.1126/science.1063351


Abstract
Full Text
Neuroanatomy of Magnetoreception: The Superior Colliculus Involved in Magnetic Orientation in a Mammal
Pavel Nemec, Jens Altmann, Stephan Marhold, Hynek Burda, and Helmut H. A. Oelschläger

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figure 1. Photomicrographs showing distribution patterns of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons in the SC of Zambian mole-rats subjected to different experimental conditions. (A-D) Nesting in unfamiliar circular arena. (A) Natural (constant) magnetic field. (B,C) Experimental magnetic field, the horizontal component of which was manipulated every 5 minutes (B) and every second (C). (D) Shielded magnetic field. (E) Movement within home cage, natural magnetic field. (F) Inactivity, shielded magnetic field. Scale, 1 mm.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 2. Mean numbers of c-Fos immunoreactive (IR) neurons (± SEM) in the outer sub-layer of the intermediate gray layer (InGo). Density counts are from the rostral (a), middle (b) and caudal (c) parts of the SC. See caption to Fig. 1. for coding of experimental conditions (A-E). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by asterisks. Closed asterisk indicates comparison with control group (E), open asterisk comparison with adjacent experimental group on the right or with another experimental group when so indicated. The upper right inset shows position of individual counting frames, lower left inset shows approximate levels of counting.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 3. Mean numbers of c-Fos immunoreactive (IR) neurons (± SEM) in the deep gray layer (DpG). Density counts are from the rostral (a), middle (b) and caudal (c) parts of the SC. See caption to Fig. 1. for coding of experimental conditions (A-E). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by asterisks. Closed asterisk indicates comparison with control group (E), open asterisk comparison with adjacent experimental group on the right or with another experimental group when so indicated. The upper right inset shows position of individual counting frames, lower left inset shows approximate levels of counting.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 4. Laminar organization of mole-rat SC. (A) Retinal projection to the contralateral SC (dark-field illumination). (B) Cytoarchitecture of the SC (Klüver-Barrera). Note that SC lamination differs distinctly from that of other rodents. Superficial, retinorecipient layers (strata zonale, griseum superficiale et opticum) are collapsed to a single layer 50 namem thick and confined to the dorsomedial rostral third of the SC. In contrast, the intermediate and deep layers make up almost the entire SC. Within the intermediate gray layer, two sub-layers can be distinguished: an outer layer of small, densely packed, and evenly distributed cells and an inner layer of larger, more irregularly distributed cells. Scale, 500 namem. CG, central gray; DpG, deep gray layer; DpWh, deep white layer; InGi, inner sub-layer of the intermediate gray layer; InGo, outer sub-layer of the intermediate gray layer; InWh, intermediate white layer.


Medium version | Full size version





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)