Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 21 September 2001:
Vol. 293. no. 5538, pp. 2231 - 2233
DOI: 10.1126/science.1063463


Abstract
Full Text
Changes in Seismic Anisotropy After Volcanic Eruptions: Evidence from Mount Ruapehu
V. Miller and M. Savage

Supplementary Material

The method to find name used in this study was developed by Silver and Chan (20). The method uses a grid search to find the values of name and namet between the split phases that best correct the seismogram for the effects of anisotropy and returns the waveform into the linear form expected for an isotropic case. We subjectively grade the events based on the signal-to-noise ratio, the quality of the removal of anisotropy, the fit of the waveform once the namet has been removed, the linearity of the particle waveform once the namet has been removed compared to the ellipticity of the motion prior to remova,l and the confidence level contours around the best fit.


Supplemental Figure 1. (A) Example waveform for a shallow event recorded during the 1994 deployment, in the initial N, E, and vertical reference frame. (B) The same waveforms in the horizontal plane, rotated into the initial polarization, i.e., the polarization determined (20) to have been the S-wave polarization before the wave entered the anisotropic medium, and the orthogonal direction. Waveforms are shown before and after correction for the splitting. Predicted S-wave arrival is denoted by Sb, while the window used in the measurement is given by T1 (start) and F (end).


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 2, 4, 6, and 8 (A) The waveform rotated into fast and slow directions. (B) This same waveform adjusted for namet. (C) The particle motion plot that corresponds to the waveform rotated into fast and slow directions. (D) The particle motion plot that corresponds to the waveform corrected for namet. (E) A contour plot showing the confidence level of the result. On this diagram the best fit is marked as a star and the 95% confidence level is highlighted with a double contour.

Figure 2


Medium version | Full size version

Figure 4


Medium version | Full size version

Figure 6


Medium version | Full size version

Figure 8


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 3. (A and B) Example waveform for a shallow event recorded during the 1998 deployment. See caption for Web Fig. 1 for notation.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 5. (A and B) Example waveform for a deep event recorded during the 1994 deployment. See caption for Web Fig. 1 for notation.


Medium version | Full size version


Supplemental Figure 7. (A and B) Example waveform for a deep event recorded during the 1998 deployment. See caption for Web Fig. 1 for notation.


Medium version | Full size version





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)