Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
NewsBREAKDOWN OF THE YEAR:
Eliot Marshall |
|
|
State-funded hospitals and universities are cutting employees and putting off new facilities as state revenues decline. The California state university system, responding to the governor's budget, has threatened to cut student enrollment by 10,000, or 2.1%, next year. Private schools are being affected, too. President Drew Faust announced a 22% drop in Harvard's endowment, along with potential delays in the new Allston campus and research area. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology plans to reduce spending by 10% to 15%, said MIT President Susan Hockfield. Federal spending on research has not changed, but President-elect Barack Obama and Congress have not yet tackled the 2009 budget.
In this murky landscape, there is at least one fixed point: the official starting date of the crisis. According to Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke, the cascade began in August 2007 with a general price collapse in U.S. real estate. Houses went unsold; owners walked away from mortgages; companies holding the mortgages began to default on obligations; a huge firm that insured against such defaults, AIG, ran out of funds and was saved by the government. Five high-flying U.S. investment banks with mortgage- related investments quit the investment field--four to become ordinary commercial banks and one to disappear (Lehman Brothers). Governments in North America, Europe, and Asia are now pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into private companies in an attempt to restore the economy's pulse.
What caused the crash? Bernanke and other Fed economists describe it as the natural end of an "asset bubble," an irrational run-up in values. Whether it's labeled as optimism or greed, the appetite for growth got out of hand, and the financial models that underpinned some investment strategies broke down. Some say the remedy is to increase controls on finance and enable more scrutiny of private funds. One school of economists argues that the solution is to create models that steer investors away from bad risks by relying less on "rational" economic principles and more on observed human behavior (Science, 12 December, p. 1624). The debates are just warming up and will occupy analysts of the 2008 crash for years to come.
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)