Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Müller et al. (Reports, 27 October 2006, p. 654) proposeda role for microtubule nucleation in mitotic checkpoint signaling.However, their observations of spindle defects and mitotic delayafter depletion of -tubulin ring complex (-TuRC) componentsare fully consistent with activation of the established pathwayof checkpoint signaling in response to incomplete or unstableinteractions between kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes andspindle microtubules.
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 920930670, USA.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dcleveland{at}ucsd.edu
The mitotic checkpoint (also known as the spindle assembly checkpoint)is an essential cell cycle control mechanism activated duringevery cell cycle, just after mitotic entry. Its action ensuresaccurate chromosome segregation before cell division. Each unattachedkinetochore, the protein complex assembled at the centromereof each chromosome, generates an inhibitory "wait" signal thatprecludes mitotic advance. Production of the "wait" signal issilenced at individual kinetochores by stable attachment tospindle microtubules (13). Müller et al. (4) proposedthat in addition to this kinetochore-derived signaling, themitotic checkpoint can be activated by errors in microtubulenucleation. The initial evidence for this proposal includedsustained checkpoint activation after reduction in -tubulinor other constituents of -tubulin ring complex (-TuRC), whichis required for centrosomal and noncentrosomal microtubule nucleation.As expected (5, 6), reduction in -TuRC components produced pleiotropiceffects on spindle assembly, including monopolar spindles orbipolar spindles lacking centrosomes.
In contrast to the claims of Müller et al., however, thisoutcome offers no support for microtubule nucleationderivedmitotic checkpoint signaling. Because even a single unattached(7) or unstably attached (8) kinetochore can generate an inhibitorsufficient to delay advance to anaphase, such a conclusion wouldrequire demonstration that kinetochore-derived checkpoint signalingwas silenced (for example, by the release from kinetochoresof the mitotic checkpoint components Mad1 and Mad2 or by measuringthe number and stability of kinetochore microtubules as wellas tension developed between sister kinetochores). An especiallyrelevant example is the chronic checkpoint activation afterdampening microtubule assembly dynamics in the presence of alow dose of taxol. Despite bipolar spindle assembly, in whichboth sister kinetochores of most duplicated chromosome pairsare attached to microtubules from opposite spindle poles, improperlyattached kinetochores produce chronic mitotic checkpoint activation(9, 10).
Rather than offering support for a contribution of -TURC proteinsto mitotic checkpoint activation, the evidence of Mülleret al. (4) is fully consistent with the established pathwayof kinetochore-derived checkpoint signaling: Disruption of normalspindle microtubule nucleation after depletion of -TURC generatesdeficits in kinetochore-microtubule attachment, which in turnprovoke sustained mitotic delay.
9. J. C. Waters, R. H. Chen, A. W. Murray, E. D. Salmon, J. Cell Biol.141, 1181 (1998).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. K. B. Shannon, J. C. Canman, E. D. Salmon, Mol. Biol. Cell13, 3706 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication 3 January 2007. Accepted for publication 12 April 2007.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Stephen S. Taylor, Kevin G. Hardwick, Kenneth E. Sawin, Sue Biggins, Simonetta Piatti, Alexey Khodjakov, Conly L. Rieder, Edward D. Salmon, and Andrea Musacchio (18 May 2007) Science316 (5827), 982b.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1139484] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
TECHNICAL COMMENTS
Hannah Müller, Marie-Laure Fogeron, Verena Lehmann, Hans Lehrach, and Bodo M. H. Lange (18 May 2007) Science316 (5827), 982d.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1136935] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
REPORTS
Hannah Müller, Marie-Laure Fogeron, Verena Lehmann, Hans Lehrach, and Bodo M. H. Lange (27 October 2006) Science314 (5799), 654.
[DOI: 10.1126/science.1132834] |Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »|Supporting Online Material »