Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
ReportsProtein Synthesis upon Acute Nutrient Restriction Relies on Proteasome Function
The mechanisms that protect mammalian cells against amino acid deprivation are only partially understood. We found that during an acute decrease in external amino acid supply, before up-regulation of the autophagosomal-lysosomal pathway, efficient translation was ensured by proteasomal protein degradation. Amino acids for the synthesis of new proteins were supplied by the degradation of preexisting proteins, whereas nascent and newly formed polypeptides remained largely protected from proteolysis. Proteasome inhibition during nutrient deprivation caused rapid amino acid depletion and marked impairment of translation. Thus, the proteasome plays a crucial role in cell survival after acute disruption of amino acid supply.
Department of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: vabulas{at}biochem.mpg.de (R.M.V.); uhartl{at}biochem.mpg.de (F.U.H.)
Protein biosynthesis in mammalian cells relies on the continuous uptake of essential amino acids from the environment. Acute amino acid restriction can occur in several physiological and pathophysiological conditions, such as after disruption of the trans-placental nutrient supply in neonates or during organ ischemia. Up-regulation of the autophagosomal-lysosomal pathway is known to provide free amino acids for protein synthesis under these nutrient stress conditions through the bulk degradation of cytoplasmic proteins and organelles (1, 2). However, this adaptation requires hours to become fully effective (2, 3), suggesting the existence of constitutive mechanisms that protect cells during short-term fluctuations in amino acid supply. Moreover, certain organs, such as the brain, are inefficient in up-regulating autophagy (3). Nonlysosomal degradation by means of the proteasomal system is known to be induced during long-term fasting (4), but the role of the proteasome in maintaining the intracellular amino acid pool during acute nutrient deprivation has remained unexplored. The proteasome, a A constitutive function of the proteasome in buffering fluctuations in external amino acid availability would be consistent with a recent report that 30% or more of newly formed proteins are proteasomally degraded immediately upon synthesis (7). To explore a possible role of the proteasome in supplying amino acids for translation, we established conditions to measure the immediate effects of proteasome inhibition in human HeLa cells. A rapidly degraded ubiquitinenhanced green fluorescent protein fusion protein (Ub-EGFP) served as a reporter of proteasome activity (8, 9). Ub-EGFP accumulated to a low steady-state level in transiently transfected cells, reflecting the equilibrium between its synthesis and degradation. As expected, upon inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide (CHX), Ub-EGFP was degraded within minutes (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 caused the virtually immediate accumulation of Ub-EGFP (Fig. 1A). To determine whether proteasome inhibition was complete, we analyzed the combined effect of MG132 and CHX. Inhibition of translation by CHX is known to be very rapid and efficient (10, 11). Thus, if MG132 were to block proteasome function only partially, the arrest of translation would lead to a decrease in Ub-EGFP level due to degradation. The simultaneous addition of CHX and MG132 instantaneously stabilized the Ub-EGFP reporter (Fig. 1A). Similar observations were made with the proteasome inhibitors clasto-lactacystin-ß-lactone and epoxomicin (11). Thus, under the conditions chosen proteasome inhibition was immediate and essentially complete.
The effect of proteasome inhibition on translation was analyzed under conditions of acute amino acid restriction. The concentrations of the essential amino acidsleucine, phenylalanine, or methioninewere maintained in the range of normal adult plasma levels (12) or were reduced individually 100-fold to create insufficiency in external supply (13). Newly synthesized proteins were labeled with 35S-methionine (35S-Met), followed by cell lysis in SDS and precipitation of proteins with trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Proteasome inhibition with MG132, clasto-lactacystin-ß-lactone or epoxomicin markedly impaired translation within 5 to 10 min, but only when cells were incubated in medium deficient in at least one essential amino acid (leucine or phenylalanine) (Fig. 1, B to D, and fig. S1, A and B). Similar results were obtained when cells were incubated in methionine-deficient medium with 3H-leucine (3H-Leu) as the tracer (Fig. 1E), except that proteasome inhibition affected translation earlier. These observations were reproduced in human embryonic kidney 293T cells (fig. S1C). Thus, the proteasome had a critical role in buffering the sudden disruption of the external amino acid supply, allowing translation to proceed normally. The use of the specific proteasome inhibitors clasto-lactacystin-ß-lactone and epoxomicin (14) (Fig. 1C and fig. S1, A and B) excluded an inhibition of lysosomal proteolysis as the cause of the observed reduction in translation. Moreover, translation was unimpaired when cells deficient in amino acids were treated with lysosomal inhibitors bafilomycin A or chloroquine (15, 16) (fig. S2A). In contrast, bestatin methyl ester, an inhibitor of the aminopeptidase hydrolyzing di- and tripeptides downstream of the proteasome (17, 18), caused a substantial inhibition of translation (fig. S2B), similar to proteasome inhibition. These results corroborate the critical role of the proteasome in sustaining translation upon acute amino acid restriction. In contrast, prolonged amino acid starvation for several hours should induce the autophagosomal-lysosomal system (3), and this could reduce the dependence of protein synthesis on proteasome activity. Indeed, after 6 hours of amino acid starvation, the effect of proteasome inhibition on translation was substantially reduced (Fig. 2, A and B), suggesting that at this time lysosomal protein degradation contributed increasingly to providing amino acids. This adaptation was not seen when cells were treated with 3-methyladenine (3-MA), which prevents the formation of autophagosomes (19, 20). In cells treated with 3-MA, the addition of a proteasome inhibitor after 6 hours of prestarvation caused a reduction in translation similar to that in cells without prestarvation (Fig. 2C).
Lack of intracellular amino acids results in the accumulation of uncharged tRNAs and leads to the formation of active, phosphorylated general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) kinase (21, 22). As detected by a phospho-GCN2 antibody, GCN2 was activated upon shifting cells to leucine-deficient medium, but only when the proteasome was simultaneously inhibited (Fig. 3A). This is indicative of a physiologically relevant depletion of the intracellular leucine pool under these conditions. Efficient translation resumed rapidly upon re-addition of the lacking amino acid, even when the block of proteasome function was maintained (Fig. 3B). Amino acid analysis demonstrated directly that the proteasome supplied building blocks for protein synthesis. The addition of translation inhibitor (CHX) to cells growing in normal medium resulted in a measurable increase in intracellular leucine within 10 min (table S1). This effect was less pronounced in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor. In leucine-deficient medium, intracellular leucine was only detectable upon addition of CHX when the proteasome was not inhibited (table S1), indicating that combined amino acid deficiency and proteasome inhibition severely depleted the intracellular amino acid pool.
At least 30% of newly synthesized proteins are thought to be degraded by the proteasome during and immediately after translation, presumably reflecting a general inefficiency of protein biosynthesis and folding (7). However, our experiments revealed a notable degree of protection of newly made proteins against immediate degradation. In contrast to the reported observations, cells did not accumulate an additional amount of newly synthesized, radiolabeled protein when proteasome function was blocked (Fig. 1, B to E). How can this discrepancy be explained? For labeling, cells are usually preincubated in media lacking the respective nonradioactive amino acid to increase the incorporation of radiolabel into newly made proteins (7). Based on our findings, preincubation with a proteasome inhibitor (7) should enhance this effect as a result of severe intracellular amino acid depletion (table S1 and Fig. 3A). Indeed, the incorporation of 35S-Met into newly synthesized protein increased more than 10-fold when labeling was performed in methionine-deficient medium (Fig. 4A). As predicted, proteasome inhibition during amino acid starvation resulted in a substantial further increase in incorporated radioactivity (Fig. 4A), even though the efficiency of translation was reduced (Fig. 1). This effect was independent of the specific ratio of labeled-to-unlabeled amino acid (fig. S3) and was equally observed when cells were labeled with 3H-Leu in leucine-deficient medium (Fig. 4B). Double-labeling experiments with 3H-Leu and 35S-Met in methionine-deficient medium showed that proteasome inhibition increased the incorporation of 35S-Met into equal amounts of newly synthesized, 3H-Leu-labeled protein by twofold (fig. S4A). A threefold increase in 35S-Met-tRNA was detected in cells after 15 min of proteasome inhibition, which would explain the increased incorporation of 35S-Met into newly formed protein (fig. S4B). Thus, the higher incorporation of radiolabel observed upon proteasome inhibition in amino acid deficient medium was due to an increase in specific radioactivity of the intracellular amino acid pool, not to the stabilization of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins. At most, only a few percent of total protein was rapidly degraded immediately upon translation in the cell types analyzed here.
To test whether translating polypeptides remain protected against proteasomal degradation even when unable to fold, we incubated cells in the presence of the proline analog L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (Azc). Whereas the addition of Azc resulted in a reduced incorporation of 35S-Met, no notable additional accumulation of radiolabeled protein was detectable upon proteasome inhibition within 12 min (Fig. 4C). This suggested that removal by the proteasome of misfolded proteins containing Azc occurred only after a substantial lag period. To address this possibility, cells were labeled with 35S-Met for 10 min, followed by a chase with excess unlabeled methionine. More than 40% of the proteins synthesized in the presence of Azc were degraded within 60 min and this effect was largely prevented by proteasome inhibition (Fig. 4D). The extent of protein degradation observed in normal medium ( Our results provide evidence for a critical role of the proteasome in supplying amino acids for sustained protein synthesis. This function of the proteasome is most critical upon acute amino acid restriction, where the uninduced lysosomal system is unable to maintain a sufficient intracellular amino acid pool. Amino acids for translation are predominantly generated by the proteasomal degradation of preexisting proteins. Newly synthesized proteins are largely protected from degradation during and immediately after translation, both under normal conditions and upon amino acid starvation. Faulty proteins are predominantly degraded through a posttranslational process that is likely to involve a functional cooperation between molecular chaperones assisting in folding and the proteasome system (25, 26). The proteasome has a demonstrated capacity to degrade polypeptides during synthesis, provided they carry specialized N-terminal degradation signals (27), but this mechanism is likely to be more extensively used in cell regulation rather than during basic housekeeping processes.
Supporting Online Materialwww.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/310/5756/1960/DC1 Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S4 Table S1
Received for publication 27 October 2005. Accepted for publication 18 November 2005.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
|
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)